These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques. Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Generators, x-ray tubes, and exposure geometry in mammography. Villafana T Radiographics; 1990 May; 10(3):539-54. PubMed ID: 2343172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast radiation dose in film/screen mammography. Prado KL; Rakowski JT; Barragan F; Vanek KN Health Phys; 1988 Jul; 55(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 3391781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography. Feig SA; Yaffe MJ Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography. Haus AG Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference levels for image quality in mammography. Zdesar U Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Dosage loads and quality of the image in mammography]. Kozlov AP; Shishov VA; Telesh LV; Fedorov IuA Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1986; (3):74-9. PubMed ID: 3750831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic]. Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography. Johnson M Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics. Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3717-38. PubMed ID: 16077223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing techniques in screen-film mammography. Hendrick RE; Berns EA Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):701-18, viii. PubMed ID: 10943272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography. Klausz R; Shramchenko N Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):369-74. PubMed ID: 15933139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria. Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology. Parry RA; Glaze SA; Archer BR Radiographics; 1999; 19(5):1289-302. PubMed ID: 10489180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent advances in screen-film mammography. Haus AG Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physicists in mammography--a historical perspective. Rothenberg LN; Haus AG Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 2):1923-34. PubMed ID: 8587546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]