These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2296682)

  • 21. Ultra-high-strip-density radiographic grids: a new antiscatter technique for mammography.
    Chan HP; Frank PH; Doi K; Iida N; Higashida Y
    Radiology; 1985 Mar; 154(3):807-15. PubMed ID: 3969487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Molybdenum/aluminum filters perform effectively.
    Burns CB; Renner JB
    Radiol Technol; 1993; 64(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 8464998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Documentation and constancy evaluation of medical roentgen units. Direct radiography with digital image recording systems].
    Huber S
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(7):238-43. PubMed ID: 10605326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system.
    Morán P; Chevalier M; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Vañó E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):375-9. PubMed ID: 15933140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Mammography -a guidance level and the present situation of mammographic dose-].
    Terada H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 12766282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance measurements of mammographic systems.
    Bor D; Akyol O; Olgar T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):165-9. PubMed ID: 18448439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mammography quality assurance from A to Z.
    Farria DM; Bassett LW; Kimme-Smith C; DeBruhl N
    Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):371-85. PubMed ID: 8190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of x-ray film by dental professionals in the United States.
    Platin E
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):396-400, 402. PubMed ID: 12046402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [A simple technique for quality improvement of breast specimen radiography].
    Meindl S; Glöcker M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Jul; 48(7):214-6. PubMed ID: 7676360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Film-screen combinations for mammography].
    Säbel M; Aichinger H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 May; 1(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 1878377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems.
    Rossi RP; Williams C; Gill D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mammographic image receptors and image processing.
    Kimme-Smith C
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1990 Oct; 2(5):719-25. PubMed ID: 2245152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. X-ray interactions.
    Bushberg JT
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(2):457-68. PubMed ID: 9536489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relative doses in mammography: the future development of film/screen mammography systems.
    Kitts EL; Beutel J; Holland RS; Blank B
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():1-9. PubMed ID: 2236846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. AAPM tutorial. Patient dose in mammography.
    Rothenberg LN
    Radiographics; 1990 Jul; 10(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 2377770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.