These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22966838)

  • 1. Interference resolution moderates the impact of rumination and reappraisal on affective experiences in daily life.
    Pe ML; Raes F; Koval P; Brans K; Verduyn P; Kuppens P
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(3):492-501. PubMed ID: 22966838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Depression and rumination: relation to components of inhibition.
    Zetsche U; D'Avanzato C; Joormann J
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(4):758-67. PubMed ID: 21970297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of analytical rumination, reappraisal, and distraction on anger experience.
    Denson TF; Moulds ML; Grisham JR
    Behav Ther; 2012 Jun; 43(2):355-64. PubMed ID: 22440071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flexibility is not always adaptive: affective flexibility and inflexibility predict rumination use in everyday life.
    Genet JJ; Malooly AM; Siemer M
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(4):685-95. PubMed ID: 23088513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Components of interference control predict depressive symptoms and rumination cross-sectionally and at six months follow-up.
    Zetsche U; Joormann J
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2011 Mar; 42(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 20650447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotion, working memory task demands and individual differences predict behavior, cognitive effort and negative affect.
    Storbeck J; Davidson NA; Dahl CF; Blass S; Yung E
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(1):95-117. PubMed ID: 24697353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brooding moderates the link between reappraisal and inhibition of negative information.
    Daches S; Mor N
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(5):923-34. PubMed ID: 25195768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cognitive building blocks of emotion regulation: ability to update working memory moderates the efficacy of rumination and reappraisal on emotion.
    Pe ML; Raes F; Kuppens P
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69071. PubMed ID: 23874872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How negative affect influences neural control processes underlying the resolution of cognitive interference: an event-related fMRI study.
    Melcher T; Born C; Gruber O
    Neurosci Res; 2011 Aug; 70(4):415-27. PubMed ID: 21620907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible control in processing affective and non-affective material predicts individual differences in trait resilience.
    Genet JJ; Siemer M
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Feb; 25(2):380-8. PubMed ID: 21432680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trait rumination and response to negative evaluative lab-induced stress: neuroendocrine, affective, and cognitive outcomes.
    Vrshek-Schallhorn S; Velkoff EA; Zinbarg RE
    Cogn Emot; 2019 May; 33(3):466-479. PubMed ID: 29623753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in cognitive control processes and their relationship to emotion regulation.
    Hendricks MA; Buchanan TW
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Aug; 30(5):912-24. PubMed ID: 25947896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mental representations of attachment figures facilitate recovery following upsetting autobiographical memory recall.
    Selcuk E; Zayas V; Günaydin G; Hazan C; Kross E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Aug; 103(2):362-78. PubMed ID: 22486677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in trait rumination and the neural systems supporting cognitive reappraisal.
    Ray RD; Ochsner KN; Cooper JC; Robertson ER; Gabrieli JD; Gross JJ
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 5(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 16180622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-individual differences in the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression are associated with variations in prefrontal cognitive control for emotional information: an event related fMRI study.
    Vanderhasselt MA; Baeken C; Van Schuerbeek P; Luypaert R; De Raedt R
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Mar; 92(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 22445780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive reappraisal and secondary control coping: associations with working memory, positive and negative affect, and symptoms of anxiety/depression.
    Andreotti C; Thigpen JE; Dunn MJ; Watson K; Potts J; Reising MM; Robinson KE; Rodriguez EM; Roubinov D; Luecken L; Compas BE
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2013; 26(1):20-35. PubMed ID: 22091879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotion regulation in depression: relation to cognitive inhibition.
    Joormann J; Gotlib IH
    Cogn Emot; 2010 Feb; 24(2):281-98. PubMed ID: 20300538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unpacking cognitive reappraisal: goals, tactics, and outcomes.
    McRae K; Ciesielski B; Gross JJ
    Emotion; 2012 Apr; 12(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 22148990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficiency of reappraisal and expressive suppression in regulating everyday affective experiences.
    Meyer T; Smeets T; Giesbrecht T; Merckelbach H
    Psychiatry Res; 2012 Dec; 200(2-3):964-9. PubMed ID: 22727710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in reappraisal effectiveness: the role of affective flexibility.
    Malooly AM; Genet JJ; Siemer M
    Emotion; 2013 Apr; 13(2):302-13. PubMed ID: 23163706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.