203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22967866)
1. Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United States.
Prabhu SS; Kaakeh R; Sugar A; Smith DG; Shtein RM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jan; 155(1):45-53.e1. PubMed ID: 22967866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluation of endothelial keratoplasty techniques and penetrating keratoplasty in the Netherlands.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Cheng YY; Nuijts RM; Schouten JS; Wijdh RJ; Pels E; van Cleynenbreugel H; Eggink CA; Rijneveld WJ; Dirksen CD
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 154(2):272-281.e2. PubMed ID: 22541659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in the United States.
Gibbons A; Leung EH; Yoo SH
Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb; 126(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 30273621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus DSAEK.
Simons RWP; Dickman MM; van den Biggelaar FJHM; Dirksen CD; Van Rooij J; Remeijer L; Van der Lelij A; Wijdh RHJ; Kruit PJ; Nuijts RMMA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):756-763. PubMed ID: 31025804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: survival, rejection risk, and visual outcome.
Mitry D; Bhogal M; Patel AK; Lee BS; Chai SM; Price MO; Price FW; Jun AS; Aldave AJ; Mehta JS; Busin M; Allan BD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 132(6):742-9. PubMed ID: 24763830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty.
Bose S; Ang M; Mehta JS; Tan DT; Finkelstein E
Ophthalmology; 2013 Mar; 120(3):464-470. PubMed ID: 23177366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in patients with endothelial dysfunction in India.
Shah P; Mukhija R; Gupta N; Vanathi M; Tandon R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 69(9):2447-2451. PubMed ID: 34427242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Visual Function and Endothelial Cell Survival After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty Using Mixed-Effects Models.
Ishiyama S; Mori Y; Nejima R; Tokudome T; Shimmura S; Miyata K; Amano S
Cornea; 2016 Dec; 35(12):1526-1532. PubMed ID: 27560035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic impact of the advent of posterior lamellar keratoplasty in Montreal, Quebec.
Beauchemin C; Brunette I; Boisjoly H; Freeman EE; Popescu M; Lachaine J
Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 45(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 20436543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy.
Kim SE; Lim SA; Byun YS; Joo CK
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):443-450. PubMed ID: 27980363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.
Woo JH; Ang M; Htoon HM; Tan D
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 207():288-303. PubMed ID: 31228467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.
Heinzelmann S; Böhringer D; Eberwein P; Reinhard T; Maier P
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 254(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 26743748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty.
Bahar I; Kaiserman I; McAllum P; Slomovic A; Rootman D
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1525-33. PubMed ID: 18440638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Population with American Corneas.
Hsiao FC; Chen PY; Meir YJ; Tan HY; Hsiao CH; Lin HC; Ma DH; Yeh LK; Wu WC; Chen HC
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(22):. PubMed ID: 31744259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty.
Jangi AA; Ritterband DC; Wu EI; Mehta VV; Koplin RS; Seedor JA
Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1148-53. PubMed ID: 22357384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term Visual Outcomes Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.
Fuest M; Ang M; Htoon HM; Tan D; Mehta JS
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():62-71. PubMed ID: 28739420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Practical assessment of DSAEK in the management of endothelial decompensation following penetrating keratoplasty].
Neiter E; Goetz C; Tortuyaux F; Ehrhardt A; Houmad N; Perone JM
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):844-852. PubMed ID: 29132691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of trabeculectomy after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison with penetrating keratoplasty.
Boey PY; Mehta JS; Ho CL; Tan DT; Wong TT
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1091-8.e2. PubMed ID: 22397954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Treatment of Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty.
Einan-Lifshitz A; Mednick Z; Belkin A; Sorkin N; Alshaker S; Boutin T; Chan CC; Rootman DS
Cornea; 2019 Sep; 38(9):1077-1082. PubMed ID: 31394551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [DSAEK after failed penetrating keratoplasty].
Zitte K; Bonnin N; Kémény JL; Bacin F; Mulliez A; Chiambaretta F
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jan; 38(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 25575419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
