BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22968080)

  • 21. The percentage of residual DCIS in patients diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: A nationwide retrospective study.
    Ploumen RAW; Keymeulen KBMI; Kooreman LFS; van Kuijk SMJ; Siesling S; Smidt ML; van Nijnatten TJA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 34756527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. FOXA1 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a prognostic marker in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Kawase M; Toyama T; Takahashi S; Sato S; Yoshimoto N; Endo Y; Asano T; Kobayashi S; Fujii Y; Yamashita H
    Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):308-16. PubMed ID: 23771556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changes in ER, PR and HER2 receptors status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Yang YF; Liao YY; Li LQ; Xie SR; Xie YF; Peng NF
    Pathol Res Pract; 2013 Dec; 209(12):797-802. PubMed ID: 24183366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of MRI for treatment response assessment after taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer.
    Charehbili A; Wasser MN; Smit VT; Putter H; van Leeuwen-Stok AE; Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg WM; Liefers GJ; van de Velde CJ; Nortier JW; Kroep JR
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1216-21. PubMed ID: 25150151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Age and HER2 expression status affect MRI accuracy in predicting residual tumor extent after neo-adjuvant systemic treatment.
    Moon HG; Han W; Lee JW; Ko E; Kim EK; Yu JH; Kang SY; Moon WK; Cho N; Park IA; Oh DY; Han SW; Im SA; Noh DY
    Ann Oncol; 2009 Apr; 20(4):636-41. PubMed ID: 19179551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of Imaging Parameter Thresholds on MRI Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Subtypes.
    Lo WC; Li W; Jones EF; Newitt DC; Kornak J; Wilmes LJ; Esserman LJ; Hylton NM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0142047. PubMed ID: 26886725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hormone receptor and HER2 status: The only predictive factors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Baulies S; Cusidó M; González-Cao M; Tresserra F; Fargas F; Rodríguez I; Úbeda B; Ara C; Fábregas R
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(5):485-9. PubMed ID: 25383894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.
    Carey LA; Dees EC; Sawyer L; Gatti L; Moore DT; Collichio F; Ollila DW; Sartor CI; Graham ML; Perou CM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(8):2329-34. PubMed ID: 17438091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prognostic value of phosphorylated HER2 in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab.
    Kurebayashi J; Kanomata N; Yamashita T; Shimo T; Mizutoh A; Moriya T; Sonoo H
    Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 23749689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating the role of magnetic resonance imaging post-neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the NEONAB trial.
    Murphy C; Mukaro V; Tobler R; Asher R; Gibbs E; West L; Giuffre B; Baron-Hay S; Khasraw M
    Intern Med J; 2018 Jun; 48(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 28869790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prospective trial of breast MRI versus 2D and 3D ultrasound for evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Lee MC; Gonzalez SJ; Lin H; Zhao X; Kiluk JV; Laronga C; Mooney B
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2888-94. PubMed ID: 25589151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is triple negative a prognostic factor in breast cancer?
    Nishimura R; Arima N
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 18369692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics.
    Lips EH; Mulder L; de Ronde JJ; Mandjes IA; Vincent A; Vrancken Peeters MT; Nederlof PM; Wesseling J; Rodenhuis S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 21472434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Accurately Discriminate between No Residual Carcinoma and Residual Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    Park S; Yoon JH; Sohn J; Park HS; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Kim SI; Park BW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149347. PubMed ID: 26866475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors associated with surgical management following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the NeoALTTO phase III trial.
    Criscitiello C; Azim HA; Agbor-tarh D; de Azambuja E; Piccart M; Baselga J; Eidtmann H; Di Cosimo S; Bradbury I; Rubio IT
    Ann Oncol; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1980-5. PubMed ID: 23567146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Second-look Ultrasonography in Predicting Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer Patients.
    Hayashi N; Tsunoda H; Namura M; Ochi T; Suzuki K; Yamauchi H; Nakamura S
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 30206035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
    Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET image-derived indices for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Hatt M; Groheux D; Martineau A; Espié M; Hindié E; Giacchetti S; de Roquancourt A; Visvikis D; Cheze-Le Rest C
    J Nucl Med; 2013 Mar; 54(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 23327900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Different prognostic significance of Ki-67 change between pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various subtypes of breast cancer.
    Matsubara N; Mukai H; Fujii S; Wada N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jan; 137(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 23184081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can Routine Imaging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Predict Pathologic Complete Response?
    Schaefgen B; Mati M; Sinn HP; Golatta M; Stieber A; Rauch G; Hennigs A; Richter H; Domschke C; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Schneeweiss A; Heil J
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):789-95. PubMed ID: 26467456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.