These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22968567)

  • 21. Surface properties of endosseous dental implants after NdYAG and CO2 laser treatment at various energies.
    Park CY; Kim SG; Kim MD; Eom TG; Yoon JH; Ahn SG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 63(10):1522-7. PubMed ID: 16182922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants.
    Dos Santos MV; Elias CN; Cavalcanti Lima JH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 19744197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of air abrasive decontamination on titanium surfaces: A systematic review of in vitro studies.
    Moharrami M; Perrotti V; Iaculli F; Love RM; Quaranta A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Apr; 21(2):398-421. PubMed ID: 30838790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of mechanical instruments on the biocompatibility of titanium dental implants surfaces: a systematic review.
    Louropoulou A; Slot DE; Van der Weijden F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jul; 26(7):841-50. PubMed ID: 24641774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bacterial inactivation/sterilization by argon plasma treatment on contaminated titanium implant surfaces: In vitro study.
    Annunziata M; Canullo L; Donnarumma G; Caputo P; Nastri L; Guida L
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2016 Jan; 21(1):e118-21. PubMed ID: 26595834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility of contaminated implant surfaces treated with an Er : YAG laser and an air powder system.
    Kreisler M; Kohnen W; Christoffers AB; Götz H; Jansen B; Duschner H; d'Hoedt B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15642029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque.
    Elias CN; Oshida Y; Lima JH; Muller CA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jul; 1(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 19627788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effects of an air-abrasive system on dental implants: a comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces.
    Chairay JP; Boulekbache H; Jean A; Soyer A; Bouchard P
    J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1215-22. PubMed ID: 9444598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bactericidal effects of different laser systems on bacteria adhered to dental implant surfaces: an in vitro study comparing zirconia with titanium.
    Hauser-Gerspach I; Stübinger S; Meyer J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 20074248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Decontamination of multispecies oral biofilm from rough implant surface by airflow with glycine.
    Leung K; Bi J; Giannelis G; Owen G; Larjava H
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Feb; 8(1):322-328. PubMed ID: 34704380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bactericidal effect of the Er:YAG laser on dental implant surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Kreisler M; Kohnen W; Marinello C; Götz H; Duschner H; Jansen B; d'Hoedt B
    J Periodontol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1292-8. PubMed ID: 12479633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct Contact Test for Evaluating Bacterial Growth on Machined and Rough Surface Implants: An In Vitro Study.
    Slutzkey S; Moses O; Tal H; Meirowitz A; Matalon S
    Implant Dent; 2017 Dec; 26(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 29095790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy.
    Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and anatase-coated titanium healing screws: an in vivo human study.
    Scarano A; Piattelli A; Polimeni A; Di Iorio D; Carinci F
    J Periodontol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):1466-71. PubMed ID: 20528698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bacterial plaque colonization around dental implant surfaces.
    Covani U; Marconcini S; Crespi R; Barone A
    Implant Dent; 2006 Sep; 15(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 16966904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cleaning potential of glycine air-flow application in an in vitro peri-implantitis model.
    Sahrmann P; Ronay V; Sener B; Jung RE; Attin T; Schmidlin PR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):666-70. PubMed ID: 22409152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
    Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
    Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.