These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22969189)

  • 41. Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?
    Choung BS; Kim SH; Yoo KB; Seo SY; Kim IH; Lee SO; Lee ST; Kim SW
    Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(3):731-6. PubMed ID: 26576553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
    Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
    Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A novel artificial intelligence system for the assessment of bowel preparation (with video).
    Zhou J; Wu L; Wan X; Shen L; Liu J; Zhang J; Jiang X; Wang Z; Yu S; Kang J; Li M; Hu S; Hu X; Gong D; Chen D; Yao L; Zhu Y; Yu H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Feb; 91(2):428-435.e2. PubMed ID: 31783029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Establishment and validation of a computer-assisted colonic polyp localization system based on deep learning.
    Zhao SB; Yang W; Wang SL; Pan P; Wang RD; Chang X; Sun ZQ; Fu XH; Shang H; Wu JR; Chen LZ; Chang J; Song P; Miao YL; He SX; Miao L; Jiang HQ; Wang W; Yang X; Dong YH; Lin H; Chen Y; Gao J; Meng QQ; Jin ZD; Li ZS; Bai Y
    World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Aug; 27(31):5232-5246. PubMed ID: 34497447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality.
    Keswani RN; Kahi CJ; Benson M; Gawron AJ; Kaltenbach TR; Yadlapati RH; Gregory DL; Duloy A
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):307. PubMed ID: 34332538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Are at Risk of Adenomatous Colon Polyps.
    Abu-Sbeih H; Chen E; Ahmed O; Mallepally N; Lum P; Qiao W; Lee HJ; Bresalier R; Wang LS; Weston B; Raju GS; Wang Y
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2965-2971. PubMed ID: 31053975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
    Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Natural Language Processing Accurately Calculates Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
    Nayor J; Borges LF; Goryachev S; Gainer VS; Saltzman JR
    Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(7):1794-1800. PubMed ID: 29696479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of patients' perceptions of bowel preparation quality at colonoscopy.
    Harewood GC; Wright CA; Baron TH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 May; 99(5):839-43. PubMed ID: 15128347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
    Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Greenlaw RL
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Oct; 6(10):1091-8. PubMed ID: 18639495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men.
    Clark BT; Protiva P; Nagar A; Imaeda A; Ciarleglio MM; Deng Y; Laine L
    Gastroenterology; 2016 Feb; 150(2):396-405; quiz e14-5. PubMed ID: 26439436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of polyp detection during both insertion and withdrawal versus only withdrawal of colonoscopy: A prospective randomized trial.
    Cheng CL; Kuo YL; Liu NJ; Tang JH; Fan JW; Lin CH; Tsui YN; Lee BP; Hung HL
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 30675926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy - a nationwide analysis.
    Moritz V; Bretthauer M; Ruud HK; Glomsaker T; de Lange T; Sandvei P; Huppertz-Hauss G; Kjellevold Ø; Hoff G
    Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 22531983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical significance of colorectal polyp detection on colonoscopy insertion.
    Sakamoto T; Ramaraj R; Tomizawa Y; Cho H; Matsuda T; Saito Y
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2019 Feb; 7(1):125-129. PubMed ID: 30788124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Quality measures and quality improvements in colonoscopy.
    Ketwaroo GA; Sawhney MS
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 31(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 25402548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Polyp detection algorithm can detect small polyps: Ex vivo reading test compared with endoscopists.
    Guo Z; Nemoto D; Zhu X; Li Q; Aizawa M; Utano K; Isohata N; Endo S; Kawarai Lefor A; Togashi K
    Dig Endosc; 2021 Jan; 33(1):162-169. PubMed ID: 32173917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Virtual chromoendoscopy for the real-time assessment of colorectal polyps in vivo: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Picot J; Rose M; Cooper K; Pickett K; Lord J; Harris P; Whyte S; Böhning D; Shepherd J
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Dec; 21(79):1-308. PubMed ID: 29271339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial.
    East JE; Bassett P; Arebi N; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Saunders BP
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):456-63. PubMed ID: 20950801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study.
    Kushnir VM; Oh YS; Hollander T; Chen CH; Sayuk GS; Davidson N; Mullady D; Murad FM; Sharabash NM; Ruettgers E; Dassopoulos T; Easler JJ; Gyawali CP; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 110(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 25732415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.