694 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22970841)
1. Digital slide imaging in cervicovaginal cytology: a pilot study.
Wright AM; Smith D; Dhurandhar B; Fairley T; Scheiber-Pacht M; Chakraborty S; Gorman BK; Mody D; Coffey DM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 May; 137(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 22970841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation.
Hanna MG; Monaco SE; Cuda J; Xing J; Ahmed I; Pantanowitz L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):701-709. PubMed ID: 28558124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital whole slide imaging in cytology.
Cucoranu IC; Parwani AV; Pantanowitz L
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Mar; 138(3):300. PubMed ID: 24576021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of microscope-based scanning software (Panoptiq) for the interpretation of cervicovaginal cytology specimens.
Groen R; Abe K; Yoon HS; Li Z; Shen R; Yoshikawa A; Nitanda T; Shimizu Y; Otsuka I; Fukuoka J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Dec; 125(12):918-925. PubMed ID: 28960858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study.
Weinstein RS; Descour MR; Liang C; Barker G; Scott KM; Richter L; Krupinski EA; Bhattacharyya AK; Davis JR; Graham AR; Rennels M; Russum WC; Goodall JF; Zhou P; Olszak AG; Williams BH; Wyant JC; Bartels PH
Hum Pathol; 2004 Nov; 35(11):1303-14. PubMed ID: 15668886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.
Camparo P; Egevad L; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M
APMIS; 2012 Apr; 120(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22429212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of multiple whole slide imaging scanners based on the guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
Thrall MJ; Wimmer JL; Schwartz MR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 May; 139(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 25927149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole slide imaging equivalency and efficiency study: experience at a large academic center.
Hanna MG; Reuter VE; Hameed MR; Tan LK; Chiang S; Sigel C; Hollmann T; Giri D; Samboy J; Moradel C; Rosado A; Otilano JR; England C; Corsale L; Stamelos E; Yagi Y; Schüffler PJ; Fuchs T; Klimstra DS; Sirintrapun SJ
Mod Pathol; 2019 Jul; 32(7):916-928. PubMed ID: 30778169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of using the Omnyx digital pathology system for cytology practice.
Hanna MG; Pantanowitz L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):182-189. PubMed ID: 31272601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.
Gage JC; Joste N; Ronnett BM; Stoler M; Hunt WC; Schiffman M; Wheeler CM
Hum Pathol; 2013 Nov; 44(11):2542-8. PubMed ID: 24075599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole slide images for primary diagnostics of gastrointestinal tract pathology: a feasibility study.
Al-Janabi S; Huisman A; Vink A; Leguit RJ; Offerhaus GJ; ten Kate FJ; van Diest PJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 May; 43(5):702-7. PubMed ID: 21937077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole Slide Imaging: Technology and Applications.
Hanna MG; Parwani A; Sirintrapun SJ
Adv Anat Pathol; 2020 Jul; 27(4):251-259. PubMed ID: 32452840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as a platform for teleconsultation: a pilot study using paired subspecialist correlations.
Wilbur DC; Madi K; Colvin RB; Duncan LM; Faquin WC; Ferry JA; Frosch MP; Houser SL; Kradin RL; Lauwers GY; Louis DN; Mark EJ; Mino-Kenudson M; Misdraji J; Nielsen GP; Pitman MB; Rosenberg AE; Smith RN; Sohani AR; Stone JR; Tambouret RH; Wu CL; Young RH; Zembowicz A; Klietmann W
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Dec; 133(12):1949-53. PubMed ID: 19961250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital pathology: current status and future perspectives.
Al-Janabi S; Huisman A; Van Diest PJ
Histopathology; 2012 Jul; 61(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 21477260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of virtual microscopy in clinical cytopathology.
Steinberg DM; Ali SZ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Dec; 25(6):389-96. PubMed ID: 11747236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Whole slide imaging technology: from digitization to online applications].
Ameisen D; Le Naour G; Daniel C
Med Sci (Paris); 2012 Nov; 28(11):977-82. PubMed ID: 23171902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In reply.
Wright AM; Mody D; Coffey DM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Mar; 138(3):300-1. PubMed ID: 24576020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole slide imaging diagnostic concordance with light microscopy for breast needle biopsies.
Campbell WS; Hinrichs SH; Lele SM; Baker JJ; Lazenby AJ; Talmon GA; Smith LM; West WW
Hum Pathol; 2014 Aug; 45(8):1713-21. PubMed ID: 24913758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantage of Z-stacking for teleconsultation between the USA and Colombia.
Mosquera-Zamudio A; Hanna MG; Parra-Medina R; Piedrahita AC; Rodriguez-Urrego PA; Pantanowitz L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Jan; 47(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30457226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology.
Evered A; Dudding N
Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 20482714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
