164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22971114)
1. Territorial user rights for fisheries as ancillary instruments for marine coastal conservation in Chile.
Gelcich S; Fernández M; Godoy N; Canepa A; Prado L; Castilla JC
Conserv Biol; 2012 Dec; 26(6):1005-15. PubMed ID: 22971114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Add-on conservation benefits of marine territorial user rights fishery policies in central Chile.
Gelcich S; Godoy N; Prado L; Castilla JC
Ecol Appl; 2008 Jan; 18(1):273-81. PubMed ID: 18372572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incentivizing biodiversity conservation in artisanal fishing communities through territorial user rights and business model innovation.
Gelcich S; Donlan CJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 25737027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spearfishing to depletion: evidence from temperate reef fishes in Chile.
Godoy N; Gelcich LS; Vásquez JA; Castilla JC
Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1504-11. PubMed ID: 20945755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for enforcement costs in the spatial allocation of marine zones.
Davis K; Kragt M; Gelcich S; Schilizzi S; Pannell D
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):226-37. PubMed ID: 25103090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A marine protected area network does not confer community structure resilience to a marine heatwave across coastal ecosystems.
Smith JG; Free CM; Lopazanski C; Brun J; Anderson CR; Carr MH; Claudet J; Dugan JE; Eurich JG; Francis TB; Hamilton SL; Mouillot D; Raimondi PT; Starr RM; Ziegler SL; Nickols KJ; Caselle JE
Glob Chang Biol; 2023 Oct; 29(19):5634-5651. PubMed ID: 37439293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term effectiveness of a multi-use marine protected area on reef fish assemblages and fisheries landings.
Rife AN; Aburto-Oropeza O; Hastings PA; Erisman B; Ballantyne F; Wielgus J; Sala E; Gerber L
J Environ Manage; 2013 Mar; 117():276-83. PubMed ID: 23416447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No-take marine protected areas enhance the benefits of kelp-forest restoration for fish but not fisheries.
Hopf JK; Caselle JE; White JW
Ecol Lett; 2022 Jul; 25(7):1665-1675. PubMed ID: 35596734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Large-scale, multidecade monitoring data from kelp forest ecosystems in California and Oregon (USA).
Malone DP; Davis K; Lonhart SI; Parsons-Field A; Caselle JE; Carr MH
Ecology; 2022 May; 103(5):e3630. PubMed ID: 35048367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of outcomes of permanently closed and periodically harvested coral reef reserves.
Bartlett CY; Manua C; Cinner J; Sutton S; Jimmy R; South R; Nilsson J; Raina J
Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1475-84. PubMed ID: 19624531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large recovery of fish biomass in a no-take marine reserve.
Aburto-Oropeza O; Erisman B; Galland GR; Mascareñas-Osorio I; Sala E; Ezcurra E
PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23601. PubMed ID: 21858183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive indirect effects of reef fishes on kelp performance: the importance of mesograzers.
Davenport AC; Anderson TW
Ecology; 2007 Jun; 88(6):1548-61. PubMed ID: 17601146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The structure of Mediterranean rocky reef ecosystems across environmental and human gradients, and conservation implications.
Sala E; Ballesteros E; Dendrinos P; Di Franco A; Ferretti F; Foley D; Fraschetti S; Friedlander A; Garrabou J; Güçlüsoy H; Guidetti P; Halpern BS; Hereu B; Karamanlidis AA; Kizilkaya Z; Macpherson E; Mangialajo L; Mariani S; Micheli F; Pais A; Riser K; Rosenberg AA; Sales M; Selkoe KA; Starr R; Tomas F; Zabala M
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32742. PubMed ID: 22393445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the social and ecological effectiveness of partially protected marine areas.
Turnbull JW; Johnston EL; Clark GF
Conserv Biol; 2021 Jun; 35(3):921-932. PubMed ID: 33448038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Giant kelp,
Miller RJ; Lafferty KD; Lamy T; Kui L; Rassweiler A; Reed DC
Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Mar; 285(1874):. PubMed ID: 29540514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marine protected areas facilitate parasite populations among four fished host species of central Chile.
Wood CL; Micheli F; Fernández M; Gelcich S; Castilla JC; Carvajal J
J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1276-87. PubMed ID: 23855822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Egg production patterns of two invertebrate species in rocky subtidal areas under different fishing regimes along the coast of central Chile.
Blanco M; Ospina-Álvarez A; González C; Fernández M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176758. PubMed ID: 28481886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatiotemporal variations in density and biomass of rocky reef fish in a biogeographic climatic transition zone: trends over 9 years, inside and outside the only nearshore no-take marine-protected area on the southern Brazilian coast.
Anderson AB; Joyeux JC; Floeter SR
J Fish Biol; 2020 Sep; 97(3):845-859. PubMed ID: 32564373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features.
Edgar GJ; Stuart-Smith RD; Willis TJ; Kininmonth S; Baker SC; Banks S; Barrett NS; Becerro MA; Bernard AT; Berkhout J; Buxton CD; Campbell SJ; Cooper AT; Davey M; Edgar SC; Försterra G; Galván DE; Irigoyen AJ; Kushner DJ; Moura R; Parnell PE; Shears NT; Soler G; Strain EM; Thomson RJ
Nature; 2014 Feb; 506(7487):216-20. PubMed ID: 24499817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biodiversity conservation should focus on no-take Marine Reserves: 94% of Marine Protected Areas allow fishing.
Costello MJ; Ballantine B
Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 Sep; 30(9):507-9. PubMed ID: 26321055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
