These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22971875)
1. Adjusted confidence intervals for a bounded parameter. Wu H; Neale MC Behav Genet; 2012 Nov; 42(6):886-98. PubMed ID: 22971875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardized likelihood ratio test for comparing several log-normal means and confidence interval for the common mean. Krishnamoorthy K; Oral E Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2919-2937. PubMed ID: 26614755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjusted closed-form confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis with a small number of studies. Kojima M Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):457-469. PubMed ID: 36539211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing the equality of twin correlations with multinomial outcomes. Bartfay E; Donner A; Klar N Ann Hum Genet; 1999 Jul; 63(Pt 4):341-9. PubMed ID: 10738545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Profile likelihood-based confidence intervals using Monte Carlo integration for population pharmacokinetic parameters. Funatogawa T; Funatogawa I; Yafune A J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 16584067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the likelihood ratio tests in bivariate ACDE models. Wu H; Neale MC Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):441-63. PubMed ID: 25106394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Type I Error Rates and Parameter Bias in Multivariate Behavioral Genetic Models. Verhulst B; Prom-Wormley E; Keller M; Medland S; Neale MC Behav Genet; 2019 Jan; 49(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 30569348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Likelihood-based concordance tests for analysis of ascertained twin pair multinomial data. Huang JK; Liu AY; Tai JJ Stat Med; 2012 Jan; 31(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 22052434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Profile-likelihood Confidence Intervals in Item Response Theory Models. Chalmers RP; Pek J; Liu Y Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(5):533-550. PubMed ID: 28594582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design. Tango T Stat Med; 1998 Apr; 17(8):891-908. PubMed ID: 9595618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood. Morrell CH Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Symmetry in square contingency tables: tests of hypotheses and confidence interval construction. May WL; Johnson WD J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):23-33. PubMed ID: 11459440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion ratio based on correlated paired data. Peng X; Liu C; Liu S; Ma CX J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(6):1137-1152. PubMed ID: 30831053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new exact and more powerful unconditional test of no treatment effect from binary matched pairs. Lloyd CJ Biometrics; 2008 Sep; 64(3):716-723. PubMed ID: 18047530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Profile Likelihood-Based Confidence Intervals and Regions for Structural Equation Models. Pek J; Wu H Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):1123-45. PubMed ID: 25925009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of means of two lognormal distributions based on samples with multiple detection limits. Krishnamoorthy K; Mathew T; Xu Z J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(8):538-46. PubMed ID: 24467286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation. López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjusted inference procedures for the interobserver agreement in twin studies. Dixon SN; Donner A; Shoukri MM Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1260-71. PubMed ID: 23487017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parameters of a dose-response model are on the boundary: what happens with BMDL? Kopylev L; Fox J Risk Anal; 2009 Jan; 29(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18808395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]