725 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22972064)
1. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Alderdice F; McKenna D; Dornan J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (2):CD003577. PubMed ID: 12804476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.
Goto S; Sakamoto T; Ganeko R; Hida K; Furukawa TA; Sakai Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012124. PubMed ID: 32271475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.
Gurusamy KS; Toon CD; Allen VB; Davidson BR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD010365. PubMed ID: 24526375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.
Dodd JM; Anderson ER; Gates S; Grivell RM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD004732. PubMed ID: 25048608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.
Dodd JM; Anderson ER; Gates S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD004732. PubMed ID: 18646108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
Poprzeczny AJ; Grivell RM; Louise J; Deussen AR; Dodd JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Teng H; Qiao L; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mackeen AD; Sullivan MV; Schuster M; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.
Bamigboye AA; Hofmeyr GJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; 2014(8):CD000163. PubMed ID: 25110856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis.
Smith TO; Sexton D; Mann C; Donell S
BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1199. PubMed ID: 20234041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
