955 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22972258)
1. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.
Beall J
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):179. PubMed ID: 22972258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ["Predatory publishers"].
Olsson H
Lakartidningen; 2012 Nov 21-27; 109(47):2136. PubMed ID: 23330475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing.
Butler D
Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7442):433-5. PubMed ID: 23538810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Caging the pack.
Nelson B
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jun; 124(6):371-2. PubMed ID: 27294405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.
Editors of the Publications Division, Ameican Chemical Society
Biomacromolecules; 2001; 2(1):19A-21A. PubMed ID: 12442743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Predatory Publishing: What You Don't Know Can Hurt You.
Nolfi DA; Lockhart JS; Myers CR
Nurse Educ; 2015; 40(5):217-9. PubMed ID: 25997152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
Banks M
J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Open access: The true cost of science publishing.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7442):426-9. PubMed ID: 23538808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Publishing: Open to possibilities.
Pincock S
Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7442):539-41. PubMed ID: 23544193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
McMullan E
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
Mower A; Youngkin ME
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The garbage collectors: could a particular sector of author-pays journals become silently acknowledged collectors of scientific waste?
Moore A
Bioessays; 2009 Aug; 31(8):821. PubMed ID: 19609967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
Michell B
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific publishing. Opening the books on open access.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5645):550-4. PubMed ID: 14576392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
Brookfield J
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Caveat emptor: the corruption of open access scientific publishing.
Xu LL; Chau AM
Med J Aust; 2014 Apr; 200(7):386-8. PubMed ID: 24794662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Open access comes of age.
Whitfield J
Nature; 2011 Jun; 474(7352):428. PubMed ID: 21697919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Crisis of the scientific communication].
Ramel B
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Sep; 165(37):3514-8. PubMed ID: 14531352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific publishing: who will pay for open access?
Butler D
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6958):554-5. PubMed ID: 14534559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
