158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22972278)
1. Future impact: Predicting scientific success.
Acuna DE; Allesina S; Kording KP
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):201-2. PubMed ID: 22972278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Count on me.
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):177. PubMed ID: 22972255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
Catlow R
Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
Lomnicki A
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
Insall R
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Q&A: The global view.
Dong-Yan J; Cheung F
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S37. PubMed ID: 25924200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
Waheed AA
Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review: Trial by Twitter.
Mandavilli A
Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7330):286-7. PubMed ID: 21248816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How do impact factors relate to the real world?
Skórka P
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The secrets of success.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):253. PubMed ID: 15538377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How will you judge me if not by impact factor?
Tregoning J
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7710):345. PubMed ID: 29921857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review: Close inspection.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):279-81. PubMed ID: 27200447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
van Loon AJ
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Training peer reviewers.
Mackey DA
Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):880. PubMed ID: 17106961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.
Colquhoun D
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Transparency showcases strength of peer review.
Pulverer B
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):29-31. PubMed ID: 21048742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality.
Gibson TA
Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):408. PubMed ID: 17653166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scandals stem from the low priority of peer review.
Connerade JP
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6971):196. PubMed ID: 14724609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Watch out for cheats in citation game.
Biagioli M
Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7611):201. PubMed ID: 27411599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
