BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22972488)

  • 1. Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP chemotherapy treatment without adversely affecting their quality of life: cost-benefit and quality of life analysis.
    Lee S; Knox A; Zeng IS; Coomarasamy C; Blacklock H; Issa S
    Support Care Cancer; 2013 Mar; 21(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 22972488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Days of prophylactic filgrastim use to reduce febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with chemotherapy.
    Scott SD; Chrischilles EA; Link BK; Delgado DJ; Fridman M; Stolshek BS
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2003; 9(2 Suppl):15-21. PubMed ID: 14613340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.
    Wang XJ; Tang T; Farid M; Quek R; Tao M; Lim ST; Wee HL; Chan A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Langeberg WJ; Siozon CC; Page JH; Morrow PK; Chia VM
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Aug; 22(8):2167-75. PubMed ID: 24652049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of age group on febrile neutropenia risk assessment and management in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP regimens.
    Lugtenburg P; Silvestre AS; Rossi FG; Noens L; Krall W; Bendall K; Szabo Z; Jaeger U
    Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2012 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 23040435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence and risk factors for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP: 2-year experience in a single center (STOP FN in NHL 2).
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Nishihara A; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Feb; 28(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 31093770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of chemotherapy regimens carrying a moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia and the corresponding management of febrile neutropenia: an expert survey in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Gerlier L; Lamotte M; Awada A; Bosly A; Bries G; Cocquyt V; Focan C; Henry S; Lalami Y; Machiels JP; Mebis J; Straetmans N; Verhoeven D; Somers L
    BMC Cancer; 2010 Nov; 10():642. PubMed ID: 21092320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A predictive model for life-threatening neutropenia and febrile neutropenia after the first course of CHOP chemotherapy in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Intragumtornchai T; Sutheesophon J; Sutcharitchan P; Swasdikul D
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2000 Apr; 37(3-4):351-60. PubMed ID: 10752986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia following frontline bendamustine plus rituximab treatment in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single center, real-life experience.
    Cerchione C; De Renzo A; Di Perna M; Della Pepa R; Pugliese N; Catalano L; Pane F; Picardi M
    Support Care Cancer; 2017 Mar; 25(3):839-845. PubMed ID: 27812763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in intermediate-risk regimens: Clinical and economic outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis.
    Aslam S; Li E; Bell E; Lal L; Anderson AJ; Peterson-Brandt J; Lyman G
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2023 Feb; 29(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 36705281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open-label, randomized study of pegfilgrastim vs. daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Grigg A; Solal-Celigny P; Hoskin P; Taylor K; McMillan A; Forstpointner R; Bacon P; Renwick J; Hiddemann W;
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2003 Sep; 44(9):1503-8. PubMed ID: 14565651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Front-line immunochemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma using dose-dense rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and pegfilgrastim as support.
    Cabanillas F; Cotto M; Liboy I; Rivera E; Pavia OA; Bruno M
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1929-33. PubMed ID: 22448918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors for neutropenic fever in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis.
    Kim YR; Kim SJ; Park Y; Oh SY; Yun HJ; Mun YC; Kim JS;
    Korean J Intern Med; 2021 Sep; 36(5):1181-1189. PubMed ID: 34265889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversion to supportive care with biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv enables budget-neutral expanded access to R-CHOP treatment in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    McBride A; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    Leuk Res; 2021 Jul; 106():106591. PubMed ID: 33957339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
    J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fourteen-day CHOP supported with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a phase II study.
    Gregory SA; Case DC; Bosserman L; Litwak DL; Berry WR; Kalman LA; Belt RJ; Saven A
    Clin Lymphoma; 2003 Sep; 4(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 14556680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors for the optimal selection of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor preparations and predictors for R-CHOP dose reductions/delays among patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (STOP FN in NHL 2 subanalysis).
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Nukada T; Hatake K; Terui Y
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):358. PubMed ID: 33823836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.