These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22972488)

  • 1. Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP chemotherapy treatment without adversely affecting their quality of life: cost-benefit and quality of life analysis.
    Lee S; Knox A; Zeng IS; Coomarasamy C; Blacklock H; Issa S
    Support Care Cancer; 2013 Mar; 21(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 22972488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Days of prophylactic filgrastim use to reduce febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with chemotherapy.
    Scott SD; Chrischilles EA; Link BK; Delgado DJ; Fridman M; Stolshek BS
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2003; 9(2 Suppl):15-21. PubMed ID: 14613340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.
    Wang XJ; Tang T; Farid M; Quek R; Tao M; Lim ST; Wee HL; Chan A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Langeberg WJ; Siozon CC; Page JH; Morrow PK; Chia VM
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Aug; 22(8):2167-75. PubMed ID: 24652049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of age group on febrile neutropenia risk assessment and management in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP regimens.
    Lugtenburg P; Silvestre AS; Rossi FG; Noens L; Krall W; Bendall K; Szabo Z; Jaeger U
    Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2012 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 23040435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence and risk factors for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP: 2-year experience in a single center (STOP FN in NHL 2).
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Nishihara A; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Feb; 28(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 31093770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of chemotherapy regimens carrying a moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia and the corresponding management of febrile neutropenia: an expert survey in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Gerlier L; Lamotte M; Awada A; Bosly A; Bries G; Cocquyt V; Focan C; Henry S; Lalami Y; Machiels JP; Mebis J; Straetmans N; Verhoeven D; Somers L
    BMC Cancer; 2010 Nov; 10():642. PubMed ID: 21092320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A predictive model for life-threatening neutropenia and febrile neutropenia after the first course of CHOP chemotherapy in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Intragumtornchai T; Sutheesophon J; Sutcharitchan P; Swasdikul D
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2000 Apr; 37(3-4):351-60. PubMed ID: 10752986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia following frontline bendamustine plus rituximab treatment in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single center, real-life experience.
    Cerchione C; De Renzo A; Di Perna M; Della Pepa R; Pugliese N; Catalano L; Pane F; Picardi M
    Support Care Cancer; 2017 Mar; 25(3):839-845. PubMed ID: 27812763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in intermediate-risk regimens: Clinical and economic outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis.
    Aslam S; Li E; Bell E; Lal L; Anderson AJ; Peterson-Brandt J; Lyman G
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2023 Feb; 29(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 36705281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open-label, randomized study of pegfilgrastim vs. daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Grigg A; Solal-Celigny P; Hoskin P; Taylor K; McMillan A; Forstpointner R; Bacon P; Renwick J; Hiddemann W;
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2003 Sep; 44(9):1503-8. PubMed ID: 14565651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Front-line immunochemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma using dose-dense rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and pegfilgrastim as support.
    Cabanillas F; Cotto M; Liboy I; Rivera E; Pavia OA; Bruno M
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1929-33. PubMed ID: 22448918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors for neutropenic fever in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis.
    Kim YR; Kim SJ; Park Y; Oh SY; Yun HJ; Mun YC; Kim JS;
    Korean J Intern Med; 2021 Sep; 36(5):1181-1189. PubMed ID: 34265889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversion to supportive care with biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv enables budget-neutral expanded access to R-CHOP treatment in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    McBride A; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    Leuk Res; 2021 Jul; 106():106591. PubMed ID: 33957339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
    J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fourteen-day CHOP supported with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a phase II study.
    Gregory SA; Case DC; Bosserman L; Litwak DL; Berry WR; Kalman LA; Belt RJ; Saven A
    Clin Lymphoma; 2003 Sep; 4(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 14556680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors for the optimal selection of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor preparations and predictors for R-CHOP dose reductions/delays among patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (STOP FN in NHL 2 subanalysis).
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Nukada T; Hatake K; Terui Y
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):358. PubMed ID: 33823836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.