BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22972488)

  • 21. The effect of optimal treatment on elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: more patients treated with unaffected response rates.
    Peters FP; Fickers MM; Erdkamp FL; Wals J; Wils JA; Schouten HC
    Ann Hematol; 2001 Jul; 80(7):406-10. PubMed ID: 11529466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Severe neutropenia and relative dose intensity among patients<65 and ≥65 years with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-based chemotherapy.
    Schwartzberg LS; Saleh M; Whittaker S; Abella E
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Jul; 22(7):1833-41. PubMed ID: 24535242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.
    Kang KW; Lee BH; Jeon MJ; Yu ES; Kim DS; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Choi CW; Park Y; Kim BS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6102-6110. PubMed ID: 32633471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Incidence and risk factors of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP in a single center in Japan.
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Takahashi A; Inoue N; Ueda K; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
    Support Care Cancer; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3313-3320. PubMed ID: 28551843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrospective analysis of relative dose intensity in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving CHOP-based chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim.
    Balducci L; Mo M; Abella E; Saven A
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Dec; 37(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 25350463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost-benefit analysis of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during CHOP antineoplastic therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Dranitsaris G; Altmayer C; Quirt I
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1997 Jun; 11(6):566-77. PubMed ID: 10173030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of age and colony-stimulating factor use on hospital length of stay for febrile neutropenia in CHOP-treated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Chrischilles E; Delgado DJ; Stolshek BS; Lawless G; Fridman M; Carter WB
    Cancer Control; 2002; 9(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 12060818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
    Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Usage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor every 2 days is clinically useful and cost-effective for febrile neutropenia during early courses of chemotherapy.
    Yakushijin Y; Shikata H; Takaoka I; Horikawa T; Takeuchi K; Yamanouchi J; Azuma T; Narumi H; Hato T; Yasukawa M
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 16(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 20924633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CHOP chemotherapy with preemptive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a dose-intensity analysis.
    Jacobson JO; Grossbard M; Shulman LN; Neuberg D
    Clin Lymphoma; 2000 Dec; 1(3):211-7; discussion 218. PubMed ID: 11707832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of age on delivered dose intensity and hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving initial CHOP chemotherapy: a risk factor analysis.
    Morrison VA; Picozzi V; Scott S; Pohlman B; Dickman E; Lee M; Lawless G; Kerr R; Caggiano V; Delgado D; Fridman M; Ford J; Carter WB;
    Clin Lymphoma; 2001 Jun; 2(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 11707870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost benefit and clinical efficacy of low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after standard chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Hashino S; Morioka M; Irie T; Shiroshita N; Kawamura T; Suzuki S; Iwasaki H; Umehara S; Kakinoki Y; Kurosawa M; Kahata K; Izumiyama K; Kobayashi H; Onozawa M; Takahata M; Fujisawa F; Kondo T; Asaka M
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Aug; 30(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 18665826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A phase I trial to assess the value of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (R-MeTHuG-CSF, filgrastim) in accelerating the dose rate of chemotherapy for intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The Central Lymphoma Group.
    Smith GM; Child JA; Cullen MH; Bailey NP; Woodruffe CM; Fletcher J; Earl H; Barnard D
    Hematol Oncol; 1996 Dec; 14(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 9267465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. G-CSF use in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) as observed in clinical practice in Italy.
    Vitolo U; Angrili F; DeCosta L; Wetten S; Federico M
    Med Oncol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):139. PubMed ID: 27822615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cost-effectiveness of adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to primary prophylaxis with antibiotics in small-cell lung cancer.
    Timmer-Bonte JN; Adang EM; Smit HJ; Biesma B; Wilschut FA; Bootsma GP; de Boo TM; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 24(19):2991-7. PubMed ID: 16682725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. XM02, the first granulocyte colony-stimulating factor biosimilar, is safe and effective in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving chemotherapy.
    Engert A; Griskevicius L; Zyuzgin Y; Lubenau H; del Giglio A
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2009 Mar; 50(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 19347726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim on outcomes of DA-R-EPOCH for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Roder L; Konrardy K; Grauer D; Hoffmann M
    Support Care Cancer; 2021 Sep; 29(9):5075-5082. PubMed ID: 33594515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from an integrated analysis.
    Pettengell R; Schwenkglenks M; Bacon P; Lawrinson S; Duehrsen U
    Hematol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 29(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 21246591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
    Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
    Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Risk and timing of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia in patients receiving CHOP, CHOP-R, or CNOP chemotherapy for intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Lyman GH; Delgado DJ
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2402-9. PubMed ID: 14635075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.