These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22974032)
1. Authenticating an online identity. Matthews S Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):39-41. PubMed ID: 22974032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The self, social media, and social construction. Stark M; Fins JJ Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):38-9. PubMed ID: 22974031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Facebook can improve surrogate decision making. Pope TM Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):43-5. PubMed ID: 22974034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Considerations in surrogate decision making in the internet age. Tsai NT Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):51. PubMed ID: 22974038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Are we prepared for surrogate decision making in the internet age? Moore JA; Gallagher CM Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):47-9. PubMed ID: 22974036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A disability response to surrogate decision making in the internet age. Burke TB Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):36-7. PubMed ID: 22974030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Surrogate decision making 2.0: digital evidence as clinical testimony. Wahlert L Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):34-6. PubMed ID: 22974029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Claims about surrogate decision-making accuracy require empirical evidence. Feltz A; Abt T Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):41-3. PubMed ID: 22974033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Social media as a contributor to substituted judgment: the hazards outweigh the value. Sadovnikoff N; Jurchak M Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):45-7. PubMed ID: 22974035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Response to open peer commentaries on "Surrogate decision making in the internet age". Berg J Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):W1-2. PubMed ID: 22974042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Status update: the complexities of the internet age bring urgency for deliberately making advance health care decision wishes known. Siess S; Moyer A Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):49-50. PubMed ID: 22974037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surrogate decision making in the internet age. Berg J Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):28-33. PubMed ID: 22974028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consent to clinical decisions when capacity is absent. Part 1: Making decisions. Nazarko L Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Mar; 10(10):18-22. PubMed ID: 15038301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Empirical fallacies in the debate on substituted judgment. Johansson M; Broström L Health Care Anal; 2014 Mar; 22(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 22367526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precommitment: a misguided strategy for securing death with dignity. Dresser R Tex Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 81(7):1823-47. PubMed ID: 15478265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Substituted interests and best judgments: an integrated model of surrogate decision making. Sulmasy DP; Snyder L JAMA; 2010 Nov; 304(17):1946-7. PubMed ID: 21045102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Saturday morning in the clinic. Galbraith KL; Perry JE Hastings Cent Rep; 2009; 39(5):24-6. PubMed ID: 19806777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]