148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22974036)
1. Are we prepared for surrogate decision making in the internet age?
Moore JA; Gallagher CM
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):47-9. PubMed ID: 22974036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Considerations in surrogate decision making in the internet age.
Tsai NT
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):51. PubMed ID: 22974038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A disability response to surrogate decision making in the internet age.
Burke TB
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):36-7. PubMed ID: 22974030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Response to open peer commentaries on "Surrogate decision making in the internet age".
Berg J
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):W1-2. PubMed ID: 22974042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Facebook can improve surrogate decision making.
Pope TM
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):43-5. PubMed ID: 22974034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Surrogate decision making 2.0: digital evidence as clinical testimony.
Wahlert L
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):34-6. PubMed ID: 22974029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Claims about surrogate decision-making accuracy require empirical evidence.
Feltz A; Abt T
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):41-3. PubMed ID: 22974033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Surrogate decision making in the internet age.
Berg J
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):28-33. PubMed ID: 22974028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Status update: the complexities of the internet age bring urgency for deliberately making advance health care decision wishes known.
Siess S; Moyer A
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):49-50. PubMed ID: 22974037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The self, social media, and social construction.
Stark M; Fins JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):38-9. PubMed ID: 22974031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Authenticating an online identity.
Matthews S
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):39-41. PubMed ID: 22974032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Social media as a contributor to substituted judgment: the hazards outweigh the value.
Sadovnikoff N; Jurchak M
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):45-7. PubMed ID: 22974035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical fallacies in the debate on substituted judgment.
Johansson M; Broström L
Health Care Anal; 2014 Mar; 22(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 22367526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Substituted interests and best judgments: an integrated model of surrogate decision making.
Sulmasy DP; Snyder L
JAMA; 2010 Nov; 304(17):1946-7. PubMed ID: 21045102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A fading decision.
Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(3):14. PubMed ID: 24821247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Consent to clinical decisions when capacity is absent. Part 1: Making decisions.
Nazarko L
Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Mar; 10(10):18-22. PubMed ID: 15038301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Brain trauma and surrogate decision making: dogmas, challenges, and response.
Nelson JL; Frader J
J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(4):264-76. PubMed ID: 15830555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Surrogate decision makers: what if a surrogate cannot decide?
Anderson J
JAAPA; 2012 Feb; 25(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 22416559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Changing the Question.
Brudney D
Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Mar; 49(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 30998280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preserving patient dignity when surrogates step in.
Gold MF
Provider; 2004 Jul; 30(7):28-9, 31-2, 35-7 passim. PubMed ID: 15354549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
