These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22974740)

  • 1. Occupational chemicals: metabolism, toxicity, and mode of action.
    Flack S; Nylander-French LA
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2012; 112():163-207. PubMed ID: 22974740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing occupational and environmental exposure.
    Semple S
    Occup Med (Lond); 2005 Sep; 55(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 16140834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An occupational hygiene investigation of exposure to acrylamide and the role for urinary S-carboxyethyl-cysteine (CEC) as a biological marker.
    Bull PJ; Brooke RK; Cocker J; Jones K; Warren N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Nov; 49(8):683-90. PubMed ID: 16141254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chemical exposure in occupational settings and related health risks: a neglected area of research in Pakistan.
    Kamal A; Malik RN; Fatima N; Rashid A
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 34(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 22445870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guidance values for the biomonitoring of occupational exposure. State of the art.
    Aitio A
    Med Lav; 2006; 97(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 17017366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing workplace chemical exposures: the role of exposure monitoring.
    Harper M
    J Environ Monit; 2004 May; 6(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 15152307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomonitoring for occupational health risk assessment (BOHRA).
    Manno M; Viau C; ; Cocker J; Colosio C; Lowry L; Mutti A; Nordberg M; Wang S
    Toxicol Lett; 2010 Jan; 192(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 19446015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evolution of industrial toxicology toward vanishing doses and the human genome].
    Colombi A; Buratti M; Rubino FM; Giampiccolo R; Pulvirenti S; Brambilla G
    Med Lav; 2003; 94(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 12768958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Toxicological significance of biological markers].
    Manno M; Sannolo N
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2004; 26(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 15584434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic effects and biotoxicity monitoring of occupational styrene exposure.
    Rueff J; Teixeira JP; Santos LS; Gaspar JF
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jan; 399(1-2):8-23. PubMed ID: 18845133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chemical mixtures in the workplace. Research and practice.
    McCauley LA
    AAOHN J; 1998 Jan; 46(1):29-40; quiz 41-2. PubMed ID: 9481217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison and critique of historical and current exposure assessment methods for beryllium: implications for evaluating risk of chronic beryllium disease.
    Kolanz ME; Madl AK; Kelsh MA; Kent MS; Kalmes RM; Paustenbach DJ
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 May; 16(5):593-614. PubMed ID: 11370938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a health risk-based surface contamination cleanup standard for occupational exposure to beryllium.
    Damian P
    Toxicol Mech Methods; 2011 Feb; 21(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 20649413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survey assessment of worker dermal exposure and underlying behavioral determinants.
    Geer LA; Anna D; Curbow B; Diener-West M; de Joode Bv; Mitchell C; Buckley TJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Nov; 4(11):809-20. PubMed ID: 17846926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the workplace: translating research to practice.
    Kuempel ED; Geraci CL; Schulte PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):491-505. PubMed ID: 22752094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On dermal exposure assessment.
    Behroozy A
    Int J Occup Environ Med; 2013 Jul; 4(3):113-27. PubMed ID: 23860542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of indices proposed as criteria for assigning skin notation.
    Lavoué J; Milon A; Droz PO
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Nov; 52(8):747-56. PubMed ID: 18687973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A dermal model for spray painters. Part II: estimating the deposition and uptake of solvents.
    Semple S; Brouwer DH; Dick F; Cherrie JW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11137696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing isocyanate exposures in polyurethane industry sectors using biological and air monitoring methods.
    Creely KS; Hughson GW; Cocker J; Jones K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Aug; 50(6):609-21. PubMed ID: 16731584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exposure assessment at the workplace: implications of biological variability.
    Manini P; De Palma G; Mutti A
    Toxicol Lett; 2007 Feb; 168(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 17157456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.