These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22977834)

  • 21. Mechanisms of percept-percept and image-percept integration in vision: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Dalvit S; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21038994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The spatial distribution of selective attention assessed using the multifocal visual evoked potential.
    Seiple W; Clemens C; Greenstein VC; Holopigian K; Zhang X
    Vision Res; 2002 Jun; 42(12):1513-21. PubMed ID: 12074946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vision in the palm of your hand.
    Brown LE; Morrissey BF; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1621-6. PubMed ID: 19100275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual distraction: a behavioral and event-related brain potential study in humans.
    Berti S; Schröger E
    Neuroreport; 2006 Feb; 17(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 16407762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
    Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
    Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Walking enhances peripheral visual processing in humans.
    Cao L; Händel B
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Oct; 17(10):e3000511. PubMed ID: 31603894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ERPs predict the appearance of visual stimuli in a temporal selection task.
    Niedeggen M; Hesselmann G; Sahraie A; Milders M
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 16730675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electrophysiological correlates of preparation and implementation for different types of task shifts.
    Hsieh S; Wu M
    Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1423():41-52. PubMed ID: 22000079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is contextual cueing more than the guidance of visual-spatial attention?
    Schankin A; Hagemann D; Schubö A
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Apr; 87(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 21315794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Paying Attention to the Details of Attention.
    Buschman TJ
    Neuron; 2015 Jun; 86(5):1111-3. PubMed ID: 26050029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Involuntary orientation of attention to unattended deviant nociceptive stimuli is modulated by concomitant visual task difficulty. Evidence from laser evoked potentials.
    Legrain V; Bruyer R; Guérit JM; Plaghki L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2165-74. PubMed ID: 16055373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Hemispheric asymmetry of evoked potentials during performance of visuo-spatial tasks].
    Grigorian VG; Arakelian AN; Agababian AR; Stepanian AIu
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2003; 29(6):51-4. PubMed ID: 14730932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences between endogenous attention to spatial locations and sensory modalities.
    Vibell J; Klinge C; Zampini M; Nobre AC; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):2983-2996. PubMed ID: 28717820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adaptive allocation of vision under competing task demands.
    Sims CR; Jacobs RA; Knill DC
    J Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 31(3):928-43. PubMed ID: 21248118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of a concurrent cognitive task on cortical potentials evoked by unpredictable balance perturbations.
    Quant S; Adkin AL; Staines WR; Maki BE; McIlroy WE
    BMC Neurosci; 2004 May; 5():18. PubMed ID: 15147586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-modal selective attention to visual and auditory stimuli modulates endogenous ERP components.
    Luo YJ; Wei JH
    Brain Res; 1999 Sep; 842(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 10526092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.