These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22977960)

  • 1. [On the Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. The S.H. and others against Austria. TEDH 2010/56 of April 1, on human assisted reproduction and its incidence on the European legislative arena].
    Vidal Martínez J
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2011; (34):155-201. PubMed ID: 22977960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The consequences of S.H. and Others v. Austria for legislation on gamete donation in Europe: an ethical analysis of the European Court of Human Rights judgments.
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 23063819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Access to medical-assisted reproduction and pgd in Italian law: a deadly blow to an illiberal statute? commentary to the European Court on Human Rights's decision Costa and Pavan v Italy (ECtHR, 28 August 2012, App. 54270/2010).
    Biondi S
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(3):474-86. PubMed ID: 23552505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judicial review of restrictions on gamete donation in Europe.
    Storrow RF
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):655-9. PubMed ID: 23084881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health, human rights and the regulation of reproductive technologies in S.H. And others V Austria (application no. 57813/00).
    McGuinness S
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(1):146-60. PubMed ID: 23420774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The European Court legitimates access of Italian couples to assisted reproductive techniques and to pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.
    Turillazzi E; Frati P; Busardò FP; Gulino M; Fineschi V
    Med Sci Law; 2015 Jul; 55(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 24777348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new approach to sex-based classifications in the context of procreative rights: S.H. & Others V. Austria in context.
    Sanderson M
    Eur J Health Law; 2013 Mar; 20(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 23544315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgment of 17 April 1989.
    Netherlands. Hoger Gerechtshof, Amsterdam
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():49. PubMed ID: 12344441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Italian law on medically assisted reproduction: do women's autonomy and health matter?
    Riezzo I; Neri M; Bello S; Pomara C; Turillazzi E
    BMC Womens Health; 2016 Jul; 16():44. PubMed ID: 27449932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Italian regulation on Assisted Reproductive Technologies facing the European Court of Human Rights: the case of Costa and Pavan v. Italy.
    Penasa S
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2012; (37):155-78. PubMed ID: 23520918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. European standards of respect for human rights in the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings.
    Tyshchenko OI; Leiba OA; Titko IA
    Wiad Lek; 2019; 72(12 cz 2):2445-2450. PubMed ID: 32124767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MEDICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES OF THE DECISIONS RENDERED BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
    Chakhvadze B; Chakhvadze G
    Georgian Med News; 2017 Jan; (262):77-81. PubMed ID: 28252433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 2014-2017. How medically assisted reproduction changed in Italy. A short comparative synthesis with European countries.
    Malvasi A; Signore F; Napoletano S; Bruti V; Sestili C; Di Luca NM
    Clin Ter; 2017; 168(4):e248-e252. PubMed ID: 28703839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Buy baby: the European Union and regulation of human reproduction.
    Hervey TK
    Oxf J Leg Stud; 1998; 18(2):207-33. PubMed ID: 16596760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychiatric commitment: over 50 years of case law from the European Court of Human Rights.
    Niveau G; Materi J
    Eur Psychiatry; 2006 Oct; 21(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16777387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human rights and reproductive choices in the case-law of Italian and European courts.
    Valongo A
    Eur J Health Law; 2014 Apr; 21(2):123-40. PubMed ID: 24851649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulating "the artificial family": an Austrian compromise.
    Bernat E
    J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 11651382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychiatric commitment: over 50 years of case law from the European Court of Human Rights.
    Niveau G; Materi J
    Eur Psychiatry; 2007 Jan; 22(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 17182221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extraterritorial laws for cross-border reproductive care: the issue of legal diversity.
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Apr; 19(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 22558659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A human right to reproduce non-coitally? A comment on the Austrian Constitutional Court's judgment of 14 October 1999.
    Bernat E
    Univ Tasman Law Rev; 2002; 21(1):20-38. PubMed ID: 15214357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.