These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22978885)

  • 1. The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation.
    Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1561-72. PubMed ID: 22978885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Feb; 15(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 24258458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):306-16. PubMed ID: 1737879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Ozmeral EJ; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1601. PubMed ID: 27106308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Svec A; Dubno JR; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43. PubMed ID: 25786946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference.
    Buss E; Hall Iii JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):907-19. PubMed ID: 21361448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.
    Eddins AC; Eddins DA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):594-604. PubMed ID: 29135686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity to a break in interaural correlation is co-modulated by intensity level and interaural delay.
    Kong L; Xie Z; Lu L; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL114-8. PubMed ID: 22894308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Svec A; Dubno JR; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203. PubMed ID: 27036255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of the binaural auditory filter using a detection task.
    Kolarik AJ; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3009-17. PubMed ID: 21117750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):335-49. PubMed ID: 25618064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Anderson S; Ellis R; Mehta J; Goupell MJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2939-2952. PubMed ID: 30230989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of stimulus envelope and fine structure on the binaural masking level difference.
    Eddins DA; Barber LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2578-89. PubMed ID: 9604352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. IV. The effect of compression on stimulus statistics.
    Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3691-702. PubMed ID: 21218901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of off-frequency masking in binaural hearing.
    Buss E; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3666-77. PubMed ID: 20550265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. IV. Models using interaural time, level, and envelope differences.
    Mao J; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):824-37. PubMed ID: 25234891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb C; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2272-87. PubMed ID: 23556595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.