174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22978896)
1. A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.
Fogerty D; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1679-89. PubMed ID: 22978896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.
Fogerty D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):977-88. PubMed ID: 21361454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.
Fogerty D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):489-500. PubMed ID: 21786914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.
Lee JH; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1700-17. PubMed ID: 22978898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.
Fogerty D; Bologna WJ; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1133. PubMed ID: 28253707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
Alexander JM; Rallapalli V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.
Mehraei G; Gallun FJ; Leek MR; Bernstein JG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 24993215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues.
Anderson S; Parbery-Clark A; White-Schwoch T; Drehobl S; Kraus N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3030-8. PubMed ID: 23654406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
Grant KW; Walden TC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of segmentation difficulties in speech-in-speech understanding in older and hearing-impaired adults.
Woodfield A; Akeroyd MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):EL26-31. PubMed ID: 20649185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
