507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22978897)
21. Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.
Hazan V; Markham D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3108-18. PubMed ID: 15603156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of language experience on digit recognition by English and Chinese listeners.
Zhou X; Yuan W; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Zhang Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL324-8. PubMed ID: 26428834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?
Warzybok A; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():88-99. PubMed ID: 26344170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Native dialect matters: perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Czech listeners.
Chládková K; Podlipský VJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL186-92. PubMed ID: 21974490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A corpus of noise-induced word misperceptions for Spanish.
Tóth MA; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y; Cooke M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL184-9. PubMed ID: 25698048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.
Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners.
Chang CB; Mishler A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2700-10. PubMed ID: 23039462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech.
Iverson P; Wagner A; Pinet M; Rosen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL297-303. PubMed ID: 22088031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Brand T; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.
Cooke M; Garcia Lecumberri ML; Barker J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):414-27. PubMed ID: 18177170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accent Intelligibility Differences in Noise Across Native and Nonnative Accents: Effects of Talker-Listener Pairing at Acoustic-Phonetic and Lexical Levels.
Stringer L; Iverson P
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul; 62(7):2213-2226. PubMed ID: 31251681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The relationship between talker acoustics, intelligibility, and effort in degraded listening conditions.
Paulus M; Hazan V; Adank P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3348. PubMed ID: 32486777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
Wilson RH; McArdle R
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.
McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE
Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mandarin Chinese vowel-plus-tone identification in noise: Effects of language experience.
Li M; Wang W; Tao S; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():109-18. PubMed ID: 26611794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
