1489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22978899)
1. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
Koning R; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.
Hersbach AA; Grayden DB; Fallon JB; McDermott HJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2412-20. PubMed ID: 23556606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of channel bandwidth on consonant and vowel identification by hearing-impaired listeners.
Strelcyk O; Li N; Rodriguez J; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1598-606. PubMed ID: 23464029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of a new hearing aid anti-cardioid directivity pattern.
Mueller HG; Weber J; Bellanova M
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 21271803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Severe difficulties with word recognition in noise after platinum chemotherapy in childhood, and improvements with open-fitting hearing-aids.
Einarsson EJ; Petersen H; Wiebe T; Fransson PA; Magnusson M; Moëll C
Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):642-51. PubMed ID: 21812630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
Fredelake S; Holube I; Schlueter A; Hansen M
Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22316007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
