These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Anaphylactoid reaction after oral administration of diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium solution. Miller SH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):959-61. PubMed ID: 9124149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Toxic epidermal necrolysis related to oral administration of diluted diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium. Schmidt BJ; Foley WD; Bohorfoush AG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1215-6. PubMed ID: 9798850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Adverse reactions during intravenous urography: are these due to histamine release? Herd CM; Robertson AR; Frewin DB; Taylor WB Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):5-11. PubMed ID: 2450612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bronchospasm during excretory urography: lack of specificity for the methylglucamine cation. Littner MR; Ulreich S; Putman CE; Rosenfield AT; Meadows G AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Sep; 137(3):477-81. PubMed ID: 6974458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute side effects of iopromide and diatrizoate in urography. Sahin H; Bircan MK; Akay AF; Kuru AF Acta Radiol; 1998 Nov; 39(6):734-5. PubMed ID: 9817053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acute renal failure: after intravenous pyelography in patients with diabetes mellitus. Berger D Ariz Med; 1979 Dec; 36(12):889-91. PubMed ID: 518354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of intravenous contrast media used in urography on the complement system and blood calcium]. Korzec-Grzegorczyk I Pol Tyg Lek; 1989 Sep 4-25; 44(36-39):830-3. PubMed ID: 2486515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate. Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative trial of two urographic contrast media - Conray 420 and Urografin 370. Eyes BE; Evans AF; Whitehouse GH Australas Radiol; 1981 Jul; 25(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 7305784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative radiological studies of Uromiro and Urografin as contrast media for excretion urography. Adamali N; Raja R East Afr Med J; 1979 Nov; 56(11):593-6. PubMed ID: 520238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Reactions to radiologic contrast media. Acute reactions induced by radiologic contrast media in urography and cholangiography]. Hald JK; Høiseth A Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1982 Apr; 102(12):677-9. PubMed ID: 7157245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: comparison with a conventional contrast agent. Spataro RF; Katzberg RW; Fischer HW; McMannis MJ Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 3538156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the cation on the side-effects of urographic contrast media. Dahl SG; Linaker O; Mellbye A; Sveen K Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1976 Jul; 17(4):461-71. PubMed ID: 9780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Severe adverse reactions to urography in patients taking beta-adrenergic blocking agents. Hamilton G Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Jul; 133(2):122. PubMed ID: 2408722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]