These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22980433)

  • 1. Percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial artery: comparison of procedural success in emergency versus non-emergency cases.
    Murphy JC; Kozor R; Figtree GA; Ward MR; Bhindi R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 22980433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation.
    Mehta SR; Jolly SS; Cairns J; Niemela K; Rao SV; Cheema AN; Steg PG; Cantor WJ; Džavík V; Budaj A; Rokoss M; Valentin V; Gao P; Yusuf S;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 60(24):2490-9. PubMed ID: 23103036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of procedural times, success rates, and safety between left versus right radial arterial access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Larsen P; Shah S; Waxman S; Freilich M; Riskalla N; Piemonte T; Jeon C; Pyne C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 78(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20939041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients undergoing PCI from the femoral route by default radial operators are at high risk of vascular access-site complications.
    Rafie IM; Uddin MM; Ossei-Gerning N; Anderson RA; Kinnaird TD
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Feb; 9(10):1189-94. PubMed ID: 24561736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention.
    Applegate R; Sacrinty M; Schafer P; Smith J; Gandhi S; Kutcher M; Santos R; Cecile A; Little W
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E375-84. PubMed ID: 23074085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry.
    Romagnoli E; De Vita M; Burzotta F; Cortese B; Biondi-Zoccai G; Summaria F; Patrizi R; Lanzillo C; Lucci V; Cavazza C; Tarantino F; Sangiorgi GM; Lioy E; Crea F; Rao SV; Trani C
    Am Heart J; 2013 Dec; 166(6):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24268216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with acute coronary syndrome].
    Gao L; Liu Y; Xue Q; Tian J; Wang Y
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jul; 94(26):2025-9. PubMed ID: 25312663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Arterial access and door-to-balloon times for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
    Weaver AN; Henderson RA; Gilchrist IC; Ettinger SM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Apr; 75(5):695-9. PubMed ID: 20146306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility limits of transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction in the real life (TRAP-AMI).
    Gellen B; Lesault PF; Canouï-Poitrine F; Champagne S; Mouillet G; Pongas D; Le Thuaut A; Jakljevic T; Boudiche S; de la Vega M; Maalej A; Veugeois A; Dubois-Randé JL; Teiger E
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1056-61. PubMed ID: 23159410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lesion complexity and angiographic outcomes in radial access percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Roberts EB; Rathore S; Beaumont A; Alahmar AE; Andron M; Palmer ND; Perry RA; Stables RH
    J Interv Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 21(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 18973507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Brousseau-Provencher C; Montminy S; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Bataille Y; Molin P; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Roy L; Larose É; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Proulx G; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1129-37. PubMed ID: 24139933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guideline recommended door-to-balloon time can be achieved in transradial primary PCI--the usefulness of a dedicated radial guide catheter.
    Malaiapan Y; Leung M; Ahmar W; Hutchison AW; Prasad S; Katticaran T; Cameron JD; Harper RW; Meredith IT
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 23228445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of the radial approach for the performance of primary PCI for STEMI.
    Cafri C; Zahger D; Merkin M; Weinstein JM; Kobal S; Ilia R
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 25(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 23468447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percutaneous coronary intervention in women: in-hospital clinical outcome: experience from a single private institution in Melbourne.
    Oqueli E; Baker L; Carroll A; Hiscock M; Dick R
    Heart Lung Circ; 2008; 17 Suppl 4():S55-62. PubMed ID: 18926771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches.
    Iwachow P; Miechowicz I; Kałmucki P; Dziki B; Szyszka A; Baszko A; Siminiak T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 28364175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).
    Feldman DN; Swaminathan RV; Kaltenbach LA; Baklanov DV; Kim LK; Wong SC; Minutello RM; Messenger JC; Moussa I; Garratt KN; Piana RN; Hillegass WB; Cohen MG; Gilchrist IC; Rao SV
    Circulation; 2013 Jun; 127(23):2295-306. PubMed ID: 23753843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: changing patterns of vascular access, radial versus femoral artery.
    Hetherington SL; Adam Z; Morley R; de Belder MA; Hall JA; Muir DF; Sutton AG; Swanson N; Wright RA
    Heart; 2009 Oct; 95(19):1612-8. PubMed ID: 19596690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Use and limitations of invasive coronary strategy in nonagerians].
    Georges JL; Jerbi B; Gibault-Genty G; Blicq E; Convers R; Tawaba H; Elbeainy E; Soleille H; Aziza JP; Livarek B
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2013 Nov; 62(5):301-7. PubMed ID: 24054405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid cycle change to predominantly radial access coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: effect on vascular access site complications.
    Nadarasa K; Robertson MC; Wong CK; Green BK; Chen VH; Wilkins GT; Williams MJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Mar; 79(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 21523899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.
    Rodriguez-Leor O; Fernandez-Nofrerias E; Carrillo X; Mauri J; Oliete C; Rivas Mdel C; Bayes-Genis A
    Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 23453093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.