These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22980433)

  • 21. Vascular Access Site and Outcomes in 58,870 Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Previous History of Coronary Bypass Surgery: Results From the British Cardiovascular Interventions Society National Database.
    Kinnaird T; Anderson R; Gallagher S; Cockburn J; Sirker A; Ludman P; de Belder M; Copt S; Nolan J; Zaman A; Mamas M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 11(5):482-492. PubMed ID: 29519382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach.
    Lange HW; von Boetticher H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jan; 67(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16331696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Operator and institutional experience reduces room-to-balloon times for transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Barringhaus KG; Akhter M; Rade JJ; Smith C; Fisher DZ
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 26(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 24486667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effectiveness of the transradial approach to reduce bleedings in patients undergoing urgent coronary angioplasty with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes.
    De Carlo M; Borelli G; Gistri R; Ciabatti N; Mazzoni A; Arena M; Petronio AS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Sep; 74(3):408-15. PubMed ID: 19360863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: safe and effective with reduced hospital length of stay.
    Bundhoo SS; Earp E; Ivanauskiene T; Kunadian V; Freeman P; Edwards R; Kinnaird TD; Zaman A; Anderson RA
    Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23067903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison between radial and femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients aged 80 years or older.
    Hu F; Yang Y; Qiao S; Xu B; Liu H; Wu Y; Chen J; You S; Chen J; Gao R
    J Interv Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 25(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 22575015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of the radial and femoral arterial approaches for coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction].
    Philippe F; Meziane T; Larrazet F; Dibie A
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2004 Apr; 97(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 15182071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Randomized comparison of radial versus femoral approach for patients with STEMI undergoing early PCI following intravenous thrombolysis.
    Wang YB; Fu XH; Wang XC; Gu XS; Zhao YJ; Hao GZ; Jiang YF; Li SQ; Wu WL; Fan WZ
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 24(8):412-6. PubMed ID: 22865313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of access site choice on incidence of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Ratib K; Mamas MA; Routledge HC; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J
    Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 23453099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of radial-to-femoral access crossover on adverse outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Azzalini L; Khan R; Al-Hawwas M; Hatem R; Fortier A; L'Allier PL; Ly HQ
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 114(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 25260813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Access Site and Outcomes for Unprotected Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database.
    Kinnaird T; Anderson R; Gallagher S; Sirker A; Ludman P; de Belder M; Copt S; Oldroyd K; Curzen N; Banning A; Mamas M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 11(24):2480-2491. PubMed ID: 30573059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transitioning to the radial artery as the preferred access site for cardiac catheterization: an academic medical center experience.
    Turner S; Sacrinty M; Manogue M; Little W; Gandhi S; Kutcher M; Santos R; Applegate R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 80(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 22162430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarct treated at the Cardiac Center of the General Medical School Hospital in Prague: a 1-year retrospective study].
    Holm F; Kovárník T; Aschermann M; Simek S; Linhart A; Humhal J; Skulec R; Reznícek V
    Vnitr Lek; 2002 May; 48(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 12061202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction--the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial.
    Cantor WJ; Puley G; Natarajan MK; Dzavik V; Madan M; Fry A; Kim HH; Velianou JL; Pirani N; Strauss BH; Chisholm RJ
    Am Heart J; 2005 Sep; 150(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 16169338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of intra-arterial vasodilators on radial artery size and spasm: implications for contemporary use of trans-radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Boyer N; Beyer A; Gupta V; Dehghani H; Hindnavis V; Shunk K; Zimmet J; Yeghiazarians Y; Ports T; Boyle A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(6):321-4. PubMed ID: 24095616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.
    Baker NC; O'Connell EW; Htun WW; Sun H; Green SM; Skelding KA; Blankenship JC; Scott TD; Berger PB
    Am Heart J; 2014 Oct; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 25262264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial.
    Chodór P; Kurek T; Kowalczuk A; Świerad M; Wąs T; Honisz G; Świątkowski A; Streb W; Kalarus Z
    Kardiol Pol; 2011; 69(8):763-71. PubMed ID: 21850615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Yan ZX; Zhou YJ; Zhao YX; Liu YY; Shi DM; Guo YH; Cheng WJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 May; 121(9):782-6. PubMed ID: 18701040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of the radial and the femoral approaches in primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly.
    Ziakas A; Gomma A; McDonald J; Klinke P; Hilton D
    Acute Card Care; 2007; 9(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 17573583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.