264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22981181)
1. How sick is the defendant? Forensic and emergency medical aspects at trial.
Buschmann C; Peters M
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Jan; 15(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 22981181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The sick accused: forensic and emergency aspects in the courtroom].
Buschmann CT; Peters M
Arch Kriminol; 2011; 228(5-6):160-70. PubMed ID: 22276367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defendant's or convict's competency to stand trial - forensic psychiatric evaluation.
Cynkier PN
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2017; 67(3):214-225. PubMed ID: 29460611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychiatry and the death penalty.
Scott CL
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):791-804. PubMed ID: 16904512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of health harm severity in psychogenic psychiatric disorders in victims of sexual offence].
Iakovleva EIu
Sud Med Ekspert; 2009; 52(4):11-8. PubMed ID: 19769309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Is the court-ordered treatment indication by the expert based on a medical diagnosis?].
Spriet H; Abondo M; Naudet F; Bouvet R; Le Gueut M
Encephale; 2014 Sep; 40(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 24094867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conceptualizing and characterizing accuracy in assessments of competence to stand trial.
Mossman D
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 18802182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The creation of an instrument to determine competency to stand trial].
Zhang QT; Zhang W; Huo KJ
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004; 20(3):150-1, 154. PubMed ID: 15495807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Competence to proceed: a functional and context-determinative decision.
Bennett GT; Sullwold AF
J Forensic Sci; 1984 Oct; 29(4):1119-26. PubMed ID: 6502111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychiatric and clinical sequelaeof delirium and competenceto stand trial.
Salem A; Leonard C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):549-51. PubMed ID: 20019004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: an empirical analysis.
Borum R; Grisso T
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(3):297-317. PubMed ID: 8889131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
Gutheil TG
Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The DSM in litigation and legislation.
Slovenko R
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 21389161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Competency to stand trial: a conceptual model for its proper assessment.
Drob SL; Berger RH; Weinstein HC
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 3427233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing competency competently: toward a rational standard for competency-to-stand-trial assessments.
Morris GH; Haroun AM; Naimark D
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 15515910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A special facet of testing the ability to stand trial: home visits by forensic physicians].
Lach H; Püschel K; Schulz F
Arch Kriminol; 2013; 232(5-6):178-200. PubMed ID: 24547619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Forensic psychiatry evaluation of mental competence--from psychopathological case analysis to assessment].
von Oefele K
Gesundheitswesen; 1996 Oct; 58(10):543-6. PubMed ID: 9035785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Competency to stand trial: rationalism, "contextualism" and other modest theories.
Jan Brakel S
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 12808691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
