These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22981488)

  • 1. Application of empirical predictive modeling using conventional and alternative fecal indicator bacteria in eastern North Carolina waters.
    Gonzalez RA; Conn KE; Crosswell JR; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2012 Nov; 46(18):5871-82. PubMed ID: 22981488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of statistical models to predict fecal indicator bacteria concentrations enumerated by qPCR- and culture-based methods.
    Gonzalez RA; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():296-305. PubMed ID: 24139103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loading of fecal indicator bacteria in North Carolina tidal creek headwaters: hydrographic patterns and terrestrial runoff relationships.
    Stumpf CH; Piehler MF; Thompson S; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4704-15. PubMed ID: 20673947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrasts in concentrations and loads of conventional and alternative indicators of fecal contamination in coastal stormwater.
    Converse RR; Piehler MF; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(16):5229-40. PubMed ID: 21840561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impacts of rainfall on the water quality of the Newport River Estuary (Eastern North Carolina, USA).
    Coulliette AD; Noble RT
    J Water Health; 2008 Dec; 6(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 18401112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterizing fecal contamination in stormwater runoff in coastal North Carolina, USA.
    Parker JK; McIntyre D; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(14):4186-94. PubMed ID: 20617564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland.
    Sanders BF; Arega F; Sutula M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Addressing uncertainty in fecal indicator bacteria dark inactivation rates.
    Gronewold AD; Myers L; Swall JL; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):652-64. PubMed ID: 20843534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid QPCR-based assay for fecal Bacteroides spp. as a tool for assessing fecal contamination in recreational waters.
    Converse RR; Blackwood AD; Kirs M; Griffith JF; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4828-37. PubMed ID: 19631958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed.
    Fremaux B; Gritzfeld J; Boa T; Yost CK
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4838-49. PubMed ID: 19604534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting the presence of human-associated and fecal indicator real-time quantitative PCR genetic markers in urban-impacted recreational beaches.
    Molina M; Hunter S; Cyterski M; Peed LA; Kelty CA; Sivaganesan M; Mooney T; Prieto L; Shanks OC
    Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():196-208. PubMed ID: 25061692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bacterial and viral fecal indicator predictive modeling at three Great Lakes recreational beach sites.
    Cyterski M; Shanks OC; Wanjugi P; McMinn B; Korajkic A; Oshima K; Haugland R
    Water Res; 2022 Sep; 223():118970. PubMed ID: 35985141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus bacterial indicator response for ocean recreational water quality testing.
    Noble RT; Moore DF; Leecaster MK; McGee CD; Weisberg SB
    Water Res; 2003 Apr; 37(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 12600392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sources and growth dynamics of fecal indicator bacteria in a coastal wetland system and potential impacts to adjacent waters.
    Evanson M; Ambrose RF
    Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 16386284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meteorological effects on the levels of fecal indicator bacteria in an urban stream: a modeling approach.
    Cho KH; Cha SM; Kang JH; Lee SW; Park Y; Kim JW; Kim JH
    Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2189-202. PubMed ID: 20138642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of monitoring and empirical predictive modeling at improving public health protection at Chicago beaches.
    Nevers MB; Whitman RL
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1659-68. PubMed ID: 21195447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of predictive models for determining enterococci levels at Gulf Coast beaches.
    Zhang Z; Deng Z; Rusch KA
    Water Res; 2012 Feb; 46(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 22130001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sediment composition influences spatial variation in the abundance of human pathogen indicator bacteria within an estuarine environment.
    Perkins TL; Clements K; Baas JH; Jago CF; Jones DL; Malham SK; McDonald JE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112951. PubMed ID: 25397595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of salinity mixing models to estimate the contribution of creek water fecal indicator bacteria to an estuarine environment: Newport Bay, California.
    McLaughlin K; Ahn JH; Litton RM; Grant SB
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3595-604. PubMed ID: 17597176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decay of intestinal enterococci concentrations in high-energy estuarine and coastal waters: towards real-time T90 values for modelling faecal indicators in recreational waters.
    Kay D; Stapleton CM; Wyer MD; McDonald AT; Crowther J; Paul N; Jones K; Francis C; Watkins J; Wilkinson J; Humphrey N; Lin B; Yang L; Falconer RA; Gardner S
    Water Res; 2005 Feb; 39(4):655-67. PubMed ID: 15707639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.