293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22981542)
1. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.
Benschop CC; Haned H; de Blaeij TJ; Meulenbroek AJ; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 22613779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpreting low template DNA profiles.
Balding DJ; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Dec; 4(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19948328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating drop-out probabilities in forensic DNA samples: a simulation approach to evaluate different models.
Haned H; Egeland T; Pontier D; Pène L; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 21216685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles.
Gill P; Kirkham A; Curran J
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Mar; 166(2-3):128-38. PubMed ID: 16759831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maximizing allele detection: Effects of analytical threshold and DNA levels on rates of allele and locus drop-out.
Rakay CA; Bregu J; Grgicak CM
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 22796031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the stochastic threshold, back- and forward stutter filters and low template techniques for NGM.
Westen AA; Grol LJ; Harteveld J; Matai AS; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 22633964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Database extraction strategies for low-template evidence.
Bleka Ø; Dørum G; Haned H; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():134-41. PubMed ID: 24528591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forensic genetic SNP typing of low-template DNA and highly degraded DNA from crime case samples.
Børsting C; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23523365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different interpretation strategies for low template DNA mixtures.
Pfeifer CM; Klein-Unseld R; Klintschar M; Wiegand P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 22739132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A universal strategy to interpret DNA profiles that does not require a definition of low-copy-number.
Gill P; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Jul; 4(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20457049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of samples comprising minute amounts of DNA.
Benschop CC; Haned H; Yoo SY; Sijen T
Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 26385713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
