These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22981542)

  • 21. The interpretation of low level DNA mixtures.
    Kelly H; Bright JA; Curran J; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 21570375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Allelic drop-out probabilities estimated by logistic regression--further considerations and practical implementation.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Asplund M; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 21733771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results.
    Benschop CC; van der Beek CP; Meiland HC; van Gorp AG; Westen AA; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):316-28. PubMed ID: 20655289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler(®) and PowerPlex(®) 16 forensic STR typing systems.
    Lohmueller KE; Rudin N; Inman K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():1-11. PubMed ID: 24841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
    Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
    Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the performance of different models for the interpretation of low level mixed DNA profiles.
    Bille TW; Weitz SM; Coble MD; Buckleton J; Bright JA
    Electrophoresis; 2014 Nov; 35(21-22):3125-33. PubMed ID: 25168355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mixture interpretation: Experimental and simulated reevaluation of qualitative analysis.
    Manabe S; Mori Y; Kawai C; Ozeki M; Tamaki K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Mar; 15(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 23089142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Calculating the weight of evidence in low-template forensic DNA casework.
    Lohmueller KE; Rudin N
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S243-9. PubMed ID: 23082963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On the exact distribution of the numbers of alleles in DNA mixtures.
    Tvedebrink T
    Int J Legal Med; 2014 May; 128(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 24337321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Extended PCR conditions to reduce drop-out frequencies in low template STR typing including unequal mixtures.
    Weiler NE; Matai AS; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21454145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.
    Curran JM; Gill P; Bill MR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15607589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of varying the number of contributors on likelihood ratios for complex DNA mixtures.
    Benschop CCG; Haned H; Jeurissen L; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():92-99. PubMed ID: 26204570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?
    Haned H; Pène L; Lobry JR; Dufour AB; Pontier D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20840286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
    Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of a 21-locus autosomal SNP multiplex for forensic identification purposes.
    Dixon LA; Murray CM; Archer EJ; Dobbins AE; Koumi P; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(1):62-77. PubMed ID: 16182950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.