170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22982432)
21. The 'buoy' stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model.
Krebs A; Deane LA; Borin JF; Edwards RA; Sala LG; Khan F; Abdelshehid C; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 19154469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term reduction of medial and intimal thickening in porcine saphenous vein grafts with a polyglactin biodegradable external sheath.
Vijayan V; Shukla N; Johnson JL; Gadsdon P; Angelini GD; Smith FC; Baird R; Jeremy JY
J Vasc Surg; 2004 Nov; 40(5):1011-9. PubMed ID: 15557918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact on ureteral peristalsis in a stented ureter. An experimental study in the pig.
Kinn AC; Lykkeskov-Andersen H
Urol Res; 2002 Sep; 30(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 12202937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Characterization of nanostructured ureteral stent with gradient degradation in a porcine model.
Wang X; Shan H; Wang J; Hou Y; Ding J; Chen Q; Guan J; Wang C; Chen X
Int J Nanomedicine; 2015; 10():3055-64. PubMed ID: 25945051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Novel biodegradable polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stent inhibits neointimal formation in porcine coronary arteries.
Buszman P; Milewski K; Zurakowski A; Pajak J; Liszka Ł; Buszman P; Musioł E; AbuSamra M; Trznadel S; Kałuza G
Kardiol Pol; 2010 May; 68(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 20491008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biocompatibility of various indwelling double-J stents.
Cormio L; Talja M; Koivusalo A; Mäkisalo H; Wolff H; Ruutu M
J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):494-6. PubMed ID: 7815632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A novel biodegradable pancreatic stent for human pancreatic applications: a preclinical safety study in a large animal model.
Laukkarinen J; Lämsä T; Nordback I; Mikkonen J; Sand J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1106-12. PubMed ID: 18291398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of a chronic indwelling prototype mesh ureteral stent in a porcine model.
Olweny EO; Portis AJ; Sundaram CP; Afane JS; Humphrey PA; Ewers R; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
Urology; 2000 Nov; 56(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 11068323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Technology insight: Novel ureteral stent materials and designs.
Chew BH; Denstedt JD
Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2004 Nov; 1(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 16474466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Phase I trial of a temporary ureteral drainage stent.
Lingeman JE; Schulsinger DA; Kuo RL
J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 12803989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Immersed multilayer biodegradable ureteral stent with reformed biodegradation: An in vitro experiment.
Yang G; Xie H; Huang Y; Lv Y; Zhang M; Shang Y; Zhou J; Wang L; Wang JY; Chen F
J Biomater Appl; 2017 Mar; 31(8):1235-1244. PubMed ID: 28274192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of a new polytetrafluoroethylene-covered metallic stent to a noncovered stent in canine ureters.
Chung HH; Lee SH; Cho SB; Park HS; Kim YS; Kang BC; Frisoli JK; Razavi MK
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(3):619-28. PubMed ID: 18214599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospects for the research and application of biodegradable ureteral stents: from bench to bedside.
Wang L; Yang G; Xie H; Chen F
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2018 Oct; 29(14):1657-1666. PubMed ID: 30141744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study.
Soria F; de La Cruz JE; Caballero-Romeu JP; Pamplona M; Pérez-Fentes D; Resel-Folskerma L; Sanchez-Margallo FM
BMC Urol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):32. PubMed ID: 33639905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Drainage characteristics of the 3F MicroStent using a novel film occlusion anchoring mechanism.
Lange D; Hoag NA; Poh BK; Chew BH
J Endourol; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1051-6. PubMed ID: 21568690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [The study of effectiveness of polyhydroxyalkanoates based biodegradable stents in ureteropelvic segment pyeloplasty].
Myltygashev MP; Boyandin AN; Shumilova AA; Kapsargin FP; Shishatskaya EI; Kirichenko AK; Volova TG
Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):16-22. PubMed ID: 28394518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of temporary self-expanding plastic and biodegradable stents for refractory benign esophageal strictures.
van Boeckel PG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Aug; 9(8):653-9. PubMed ID: 21586341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Advances in ureteral stent development.
Chew BH; Lange D
Curr Opin Urol; 2016 May; 26(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 26840739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The morphological, in situ effects of a self-reinforced bioabsorbable polylactide (SR-PLA 96) ureteric stent; an experimental study.
Lumiaho J; Heino A; Pietiläinen T; Ala-Opas M; Talja M; Välimaa T; Törmälä P
J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1360-3. PubMed ID: 10992415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An in vivo porcine evaluation of the safety, bioavailability, and tissue penetration of a ketorolac drug-eluting ureteral stent designed to improve comfort.
Chew BH; Davoudi H; Li J; Denstedt JD
J Endourol; 2010 Jun; 24(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 20367085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
