196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22982767)
21. Attachment of Acanthamoeba to first- and second-generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Beattie TK; Tomlinson A; McFadyen AK
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jan; 113(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 16360208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ex vivo protein deposition on bi-weekly silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Boone A; Heynen M; Joyce E; Varikooty J; Jones L
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 86(11):1241-9. PubMed ID: 19770811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tonopen XL assessment of intraocular pressure through silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Schornack M; Rice M; Hodge D
Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Sep; 38(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 22810946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Anomalies in the prescribing of soft contact lens power.
Young G; Moody K; Sulley A
Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jan; 35(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 19125042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Regional changes in corneal thickness and shape with soft contact lenses.
Tyagi G; Collins M; Read S; Davis B
Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Aug; 87(8):567-75. PubMed ID: 20512082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro water wettability of silicone hydrogel contact lenses determined using the sessile drop and captive bubble techniques.
Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Nov; 83(2):496-502. PubMed ID: 17503532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Refractive index and equilibrium water content of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
González-Méijome JM; Lira M; López-Alemany A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA; Refojo MF
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 16390483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative study of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage contact lenses after LASEK.
Gil-Cazorla R; Teus MA; Hernández-Verdejo JL; De Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Sep; 85(9):884-8. PubMed ID: 18772724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Current silicone hydrogel UVR blocking lenses and their associated protection factors.
DeLoss KS; Walsh JE; Bergmanson JP
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2010 Jun; 33(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 20042360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components.
Cheng L; Muller SJ; Radke CJ
Curr Eye Res; 2004 Feb; 28(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 14972715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimation of human corneal oxygen consumption by noninvasive measurement of tear oxygen tension while wearing hydrogel lenses.
Bonanno JA; Stickel T; Nguyen T; Biehl T; Carter D; Benjamin WJ; Soni PS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 43(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 11818379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition.
Zhao Z; Carnt NA; Aliwarga Y; Wei X; Naduvilath T; Garrett Q; Korth J; Willcox MD
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 19165125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mechanical properties of contact lenses: The contribution of measurement techniques and clinical feedback to 50 years of materials development.
Bhamra TS; Tighe BJ
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Apr; 40(2):70-81. PubMed ID: 27884616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of lens material and intra-ocular pressure on the outcome of non-contact tonometry over soft contact lenses.
Patel S; Stevenson G
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 19195922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contact lens-induced circumlimbal staining in silicone hydrogel contact lenses worn on a daily wear basis.
Maïssa C; Guillon M; Garofalo RJ
Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 22146704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of modulus of elasticity of silicone hydrogel contact lenses on meibomian glands morphology and function.
Iqbal A; Thomas R; Mahadevan R
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Sep; 104(7):760-766. PubMed ID: 33689628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of in-air and in-saline focimeter measurement of the back vertex power of spherical soft contact lenses.
Pearson RM; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):508-17. PubMed ID: 22958210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Uptake and release of dexamethasone phosphate from silicone hydrogel and group I, II, and IV hydrogel contact lenses.
Boone A; Hui A; Jones L
Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):260-7. PubMed ID: 19657281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tear film surface quality with soft contact lenses using dynamic-area high-speed videokeratoscopy.
Alonso-Caneiro D; Iskander DR; Collins MJ
Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 19657279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers.
Dillehay SM; Miller MB
Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):272-7. PubMed ID: 17993820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
