These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2298307)

  • 21. Successful intrauterine pregnancy following salpingostomy; case report.
    Eze JN
    Niger J Med; 2008; 17(3):360-2. PubMed ID: 18788269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new tubal classification system for fertility prognosis after laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy.
    Ding Y; Huang W; Jiang H; Zhu J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():136-41. PubMed ID: 27285304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fallopian tube stripping forceps: a novel instrumental design for distal tubal pregnancy laparoscopy.
    Liu L; Zhang G; Zhou W; Chi Y; Yang M; Ge L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():109-13. PubMed ID: 25461362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproductive outcome after laparoscopic instillation of hyperosmolar glucose into unruptured tubal pregnancies.
    Giuliani A; Hoenigl W; Schoell W; Tamussino K; Arikan G; Lang PF
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Aug; 76(2):366-9. PubMed ID: 11476787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fertility outcome following tubal pregnancy.
    Urman B; Zouves C; Gomel V
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1991; 22(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 1844322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the recurrence and fertility rate following salpingostomy in patients with tubal ectopic pregnancy.
    Poordast T; Naghmehsanj Z; Vahdani R; Moradi Alamdarloo S; Ashraf MA; Samsami A; Najib FS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jan; 22(1):2. PubMed ID: 34979988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnosis and management of tubal pregnancy: effect on fertility outcome.
    Paavonen J; Varjonen-Toivonen M; Komulainen M; Heinonen PK
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1985 Apr; 23(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 2862074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Timing of pregnancy after surgery for tubal pregnancy].
    Wang HY; Wen AM; Yao SZ; Hong DH
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Jan; 27(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 17259161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Partial tubal devascularisation: a novel procedure for tubal conservation in ectopic pregnancy.
    Shazly SA; Gayar AG; Abdelbadee AY; Afifi AM; Nassr AA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):202-205. PubMed ID: 30286665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conservative versus radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. A review.
    Clausen I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Jan; 75(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 8561006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Results of conservative laparoscopic treatment of isthmic ectopic pregnancies: a 26 case study.
    Chapron C; Pouly JL; Wattiez A; Mage G; Canis M; Manhes H; Bruhat MA
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Mar; 7(3):422-4. PubMed ID: 1534090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Randomised trial of systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy.
    Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Mol BW; Van der Veen F; Ankum WM; Bossuyt PM; Hemrika DJ; Lammes FB
    Lancet; 1997 Sep; 350(9080):774-9. PubMed ID: 9297998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Salpingotomy or salpingectomy in tubal ectopic pregnancy: what do women prefer?
    van Mello NM; Mol F; Opmeer BC; de Bekker-Grob EW; Essink-Bot ML; Ankum WM; Mol BW; van der Veen F; Hajenius PJ
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 20884296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy by salpingotomy with or without tubal suturing and salpingectomy.
    Tulandi T; Guralnick M
    Fertil Steril; 1991 Jan; 55(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 1986973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [4 tubal pregnancies in the same patient: advantages and disadvantages of tube-saving operation].
    Neeser E; Hirsch HA
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Oct; 45(10):706-9. PubMed ID: 4065517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative case-controlled study of laparoscopic vs laparotomy management of ectopic pregnancy: an evaluation of reproductive performance after radical vs conservative treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy.
    Tahseen S; Wyldes M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Mar; 23(2):189-90. PubMed ID: 12745569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Treatment of tubal pregnancy by pelviscopy--complications, pregnancy and recurrence rates].
    Mecke H; Argiriou C Semm K
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Jul; 51(7):549-53. PubMed ID: 1834510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors affecting fertility following radical versus conservative surgical treatment for tubal pregnancy.
    Rashid M; Osman SH; Khashoggi TY; Kamal FA
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Apr; 22(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 11331492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Failure of tubal closure following laser salpingostomy for ampullary tubal ectopic pregnancy.
    Cropp CS; Cowell PD; Rock JA
    Fertil Steril; 1987 Nov; 48(5):887-8. PubMed ID: 2444466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conservative surgical management of isthmic ectopic pregnancies.
    Smith HO; Toledo AA; Thompson JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 157(3):604-10. PubMed ID: 3631162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.