156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22983272)
1. Abdominal sacral hysteropexy: a pilot study comparing sacral hysteropexy to sacral colpopexy with hysterectomy.
Cvach K; Geoffrion R; Cundiff GW
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 22983272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy and subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: A pilot study.
Gracia M; Perelló M; Bataller E; Espuña M; Parellada M; Genís D; Balasch J; Carmona F
Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Sep; 34(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 24975722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines].
Cayrac M; Warembourg S; Le Normand L; Fatton B
Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
Hanes CR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh.
Bensinger G; Lind L; Lesser M; Guess M; Winkler HA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 193(6):2094-8. PubMed ID: 16325622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation on clinical effectiveness of modified laparoscopic sacral colpopexy].
Zhang XW; Xu L; Li YX; Gan YP; Chen LQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):570-4. PubMed ID: 24199920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of Functional Apical Support After Sacral Hysteropexy Versus Sacral Colpopexy: A Cadaveric Study.
Maldonado PA; Jackson LA; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Wai CY
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Nov; 26(11):664-667. PubMed ID: 30614833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study.
Maher CF; Qatawneh AM; Dwyer PL; Carey MP; Cornish A; Schluter PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 14749629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients.
Stepanian AA; Miklos JR; Moore RD; Mattox TF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 18312989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical outcomes of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy related to body mass index.
McDermott CD; Park J; Terry CL; Woodman PJ; Hale DS
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Jan; 34(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 22260763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uterine-preserving POP surgery.
Gutman R; Maher C
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1803-13. PubMed ID: 24142056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?
Gutman RE
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].
Han JS; Zhang K; Zhu FL; Yao Y; Liang HM; Zhou LF; Guo HY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 21426766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety of combined abdominal sacral colpopexy and sigmoid resection with suture rectopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
VanderPas Lamb S; Massengill J; Sheridan MJ; Stern LE; von Pechmann W
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 25185604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of surgical approach on physical activity and pain control after sacral colpopexy.
Collins SA; Tulikangas PK; O'Sullivan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):438.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22397901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy with concomitant hysterectomy.
Nosti PA; Lowman JK; Zollinger TW; Hale DS; Woodman PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):541.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19766973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
