BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2298412)

  • 1. A new way to expose endocervical lesions at colposcopy.
    Johnson N; Crompton AC
    Gynecol Oncol; 1990 Feb; 36(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 2298412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Lamicel to expose high cervical lesions during colposcopic examinations.
    Johnson N; Crompton AC; Wyatt J; Buchan PC; Jarvis GJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Jan; 97(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 2306427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dilating the cervix medically to overcome an unsatisfactory colposcopy: 5 year follow up.
    Johnson N; Brady J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Nov; 69(2):125-7. PubMed ID: 8902445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some observations on the value of endocervical curettage performed as an integral part of colposcopic examination of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Urcuyo R; Rome RM; Nelson JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Aug; 128(7):787-92. PubMed ID: 879246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical evaluation of the endocervical curettage.
    Spirtos NM; Schlaerth JB; d'Ablaing G; Morrow CP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 3658281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    van Niekerk WA; Dunton CJ; Richart RM; Hilgarth M; Kato H; Kaufman RH; Mango LJ; Nozawa S; Robinowitz M
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 9479322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positive endocervical curettage in patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical implications.
    Krebs HB; Wheelock JB; Hurt WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 3822303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator use in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy.
    McCord ML; Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Lipscomb GH; Collins KW; Parsons LH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 7800319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The colposcopic examination.
    Frank JE
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2008; 53(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 18761298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endocervical curettage in the evaluation of cervical disease in patients with adequate colposcopy.
    Soisson AP; Molina CY; Benson WL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 3336531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
    Hunter V; Tseng P
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is it time for a reconsideration of the criteria for cone biopsy?
    Lopes A; Pearson SE; Mor-Yosef S; Ireland D; Monaghan JM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Nov; 96(11):1345-7. PubMed ID: 2611175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia.
    Ullal A; Roberts M; Bulmer JN; Mathers ME; Wadehra V
    Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 18557985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Video monitoring of smear-taking at colposcopy: relationship to cytology.
    Al-Awadhi RM; Mansell E; Chong S; Chow C; Singer A; Coleman DV
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):967-73. PubMed ID: 15327612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic localization of the squamocolumnar junction before cervical cone biopsy in 284 patients.
    Saunders N; Anderson D; Sheridan E; Gilbert L; Sharp F
    Cancer; 1990 Mar; 65(6):1312-7. PubMed ID: 2306679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: Clinical practice guidelines from the Italian society of colposcopy and cervical pathology (SICPCV).
    Ciavattini A; Giannella L; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Sopracordevole F; Chiossi G; Di Giuseppe J;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():273-277. PubMed ID: 31352128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cone biopsy: has endocervical sampling a role?
    Anderson DJ; Strachan F; Parkin DE
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Aug; 99(8):668-70. PubMed ID: 1390473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic value of conization of the uterine cervix in the management of cervical neoplasia: a review of 756 consecutive patients.
    Matseoane S; Williams SB; Navarro C; Hedriana H; Mushayandebvu T
    Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Dec; 47(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 1473739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.