BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2298418)

  • 1. Prognostic significance of flow cytometry studies in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Rehn S; Glimelius B; Strang P; Sundström C; Tribukait B
    Hematol Oncol; 1990; 8(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 2298418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flow cytometric DNA analysis: a prognostic tool in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Christensson B; Lindemalm C; Johansson B; Mellstedt H; Tribukait B; Biberfeld P
    Leuk Res; 1989; 13(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 2716347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of proliferation-associated parameters in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Rehn S; Glimelius B; Sundström C
    Hematol Oncol; 1991; 9(6):287-98. PubMed ID: 1748395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flow cytometric S-phase fraction as a complementary biological parameter for the cytological grading of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Pinto AE; Cabeçadas J; Nóbrega SD; Mendonça E
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Oct; 29(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 14506670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic significance of serum lactic dehydrogenase levels and fraction of S-phase cells in non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
    Lindh J; Lenner P; Osterman B; Roos G
    Eur J Haematol; 1993 May; 50(5):258-63. PubMed ID: 8319787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA content in high and intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma-prognostic significance and clinicopathological correlations.
    Cowan RA; Harris M; Jones M; Crowther D
    Br J Cancer; 1989 Dec; 60(6):904-10. PubMed ID: 2605100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of S-phase fraction, working formulation, and Kiel classification in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Joensuu H; Klemi PJ; Söderström KO; Jalkanen S
    Cancer; 1991 Oct; 68(7):1564-71. PubMed ID: 1893358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic relevance of ploidy and proliferative activity evaluation by flow cytometry in poor prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.
    De Lena M; Barletta A; Marzullo F; Lorusso V; Berardi F; Tommasi S; Mangia A; Paradiso A
    Haematologica; 1992; 77(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 1398287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of monoclonal antibody phenotyping and cellular DNA content in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The Southeastern Cancer Study Group experience.
    Wain SL; Braylan RC; Borowitz MJ
    Cancer; 1987 Nov; 60(10):2403-11. PubMed ID: 3499212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic significance of DNA-analysis by flow cytometry in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Roos G; Dige U; Lenner P; Lindh J; Johansson H
    Hematol Oncol; 1985; 3(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 4085977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinico-pathological and immunological study of unfavourable non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Comparison of the Rappaport and Kiel classifications.
    Lindemalm C; Christensson B; Johansson B; Mellstedt H; Ost A; Biberfeld P
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand A; 1983 Nov; 91(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 6364692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic, predictive and prognostic verification of DNA flow cytometric measurements performed at diagnosis for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma adult patients.
    Lackowska B; Gruchała A; Jaszcz-Gruchała A; Rolski J; Zemełka T; Dańda D; Ryś J
    Pol J Pathol; 2012 Mar; 63(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 22535602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mitotic activity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Relation to the Kiel classification and to prognosis.
    Akerman M; Brandt L; Johnson A; Olsson H
    Br J Cancer; 1987 Feb; 55(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 3814492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Aggressive' low grade lymphocytic lymphomas can be identified by flow cytometric S-phase determinations.
    Lindh J; Jonsson H; Lenner P; Roos G
    Hematol Oncol; 1992; 10(3-4):171-9. PubMed ID: 1398513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biologic progression in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A flow cytometric study.
    Joensuu H; Klemi PJ; Jalkanen S
    Cancer; 1990 Jun; 65(11):2564-71. PubMed ID: 2337874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The prognostic significance of proliferative activity in poor histology non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a flow cytometry study using archival material.
    Young GA; Hedley DW; Rugg CA; Iland HJ
    Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol; 1987 Oct; 23(10):1497-504. PubMed ID: 3678313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cell proliferation and DNA content in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Flow cytometry in relation to lymphoma classification.
    Christensson B; Tribukait B; Linder IL; Ullman B; Biberfeld P
    Cancer; 1986 Sep; 58(6):1295-304. PubMed ID: 3742454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic and predictive evaluation of DNA content, S-phase fraction and immunophenotyping in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in adults. A prospective study.
    Lackowska B; Gruchała A; Niezabitowski A; Radkowski A; Skołyszewski J; Ryś J; Szklarski W; Sokołowski A
    Pol J Pathol; 1999; 50(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 10412271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors including fraction of S-phase cells.
    Lenner P; Roos G; Johansson H; Lindh J; Dige U
    Acta Oncol; 1987; 26(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 3651263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of ploidy and proliferative activity in childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD).
    Coad NA; Jones TJ; Muir KR; Parkes SE; Smith K; Raafat F; Mann JR
    Pediatr Pathol Lab Med; 1997; 17(6):893-902. PubMed ID: 9353829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.