These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22984897)

  • 1. Using educational outreach and a financial incentive to increase general practices' contribution to chlamydia screening in South-East London 2003-2011.
    Kalwij S; French S; Mugezi R; Baraitser P
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Sep; 12():802. PubMed ID: 22984897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.
    Hocking JS; Temple-Smith M; van Driel M; Law M; Guy R; Bulfone L; Wood A; Low N; Donovan B; Fairley CK; Kaldor J; Gunn J
    Implement Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(1):122. PubMed ID: 27624835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Bilardi JE; Fairley CK; Temple-Smith MJ; Pirotta MV; McNamee KM; Bourke S; Gurrin LC; Hellard M; Sanci LA; Wills MJ; Walker J; Chen MY; Hocking JS
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Feb; 10():70. PubMed ID: 20158918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tools to overcome potential barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice: Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention.
    Ricketts EJ; Francischetto EO; Wallace LM; Hogan A; McNulty CA
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Mar; 17():33. PubMed ID: 27001608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring why a complex intervention piloted in general practices did not result in an increase in chlamydia screening and diagnosis: a qualitative evaluation using the fidelity of implementation model.
    Allison R; Lecky DM; Town K; Rugman C; Ricketts EJ; Ockendon-Powell N; Folkard KA; Dunbar JK; McNulty CA
    BMC Fam Pract; 2017 Mar; 18(1):43. PubMed ID: 28327096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should young people be paid for getting tested? A national comparative study to evaluate patient financial incentives for chlamydia screening.
    Zenner D; Molinar D; Nichols T; Riha J; Macintosh M; Nardone A
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Apr; 12():261. PubMed ID: 22471791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing chlamydia screening tests in general practice: a modified Zelen prospective Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial evaluating a complex intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.
    McNulty CA; Hogan AH; Ricketts EJ; Wallace L; Oliver I; Campbell R; Kalwij S; O'Connell E; Charlett A
    Sex Transm Infect; 2014 May; 90(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 24005256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of removing financial incentives and/or audit and feedback on chlamydia testing in general practice: A cluster randomised controlled trial (ACCEPt-able).
    Hocking JS; Wood A; Temple-Smith M; Braat S; Law M; Bulfone L; Jones C; van Driel M; Fairley CK; Donovan B; Guy R; Low N; Kaldor J; Gunn J
    PLoS Med; 2022 Jan; 19(1):e1003858. PubMed ID: 34982767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010.
    Woodhall SC; Sile B; Talebi A; Nardone A; Baraitser P
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Dec; 12():1095. PubMed ID: 23253518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Australian general practitioner chlamydia testing rates among young people.
    Kong FY; Guy RJ; Hocking JS; Merritt T; Pirotta M; Heal C; Bergeri I; Donovan B; Hellard ME
    Med J Aust; 2011 Mar; 194(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 21381999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chlamydia screening practices among physicians and community nurses in Yukon, Canada.
    Machalek K; Hanley BE; Kajiwara JN; Pasquali PE; Stannard CJ
    Int J Circumpolar Health; 2013; 72():. PubMed ID: 23984299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing for sexually transmitted infections in general practice: cross-sectional study.
    Sadler KE; Low N; Mercer CH; Sutcliffe LJ; Islam MA; Shafi S; Brook GM; Maguire H; Horner PJ; Cassell JA
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Nov; 10():667. PubMed ID: 21047396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Service evaluation of an educational intervention to improve sexual health services in primary care implemented using a step-wedge design: analysis of chlamydia testing and diagnosis rate changes.
    Town K; McNulty CA; Ricketts EJ; Hartney T; Nardone A; Folkard KA; Charlett A; Dunbar JK
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Aug; 16():686. PubMed ID: 27484823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inequalities in rates of gonorrhoea and chlamydia between black ethnic groups in south east London: cross sectional study.
    Low N; Sterne JA; Barlow D
    Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Feb; 77(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 11158686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactive workshops increase chlamydia testing in primary care--a controlled study.
    McNulty CA; Thomas M; Bowen J; Buckley C; Charlett A; Gelb D; Foy C; Sloss J; Smellie S
    Fam Pract; 2008 Aug; 25(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 18579709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The views of general practitioners and practice nurses towards the barriers and facilitators of proactive, internet-based chlamydia screening for reaching young heterosexual men.
    Lorimer K; Martin S; McDaid LM
    BMC Fam Pract; 2014 Jun; 15():127. PubMed ID: 24972919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategies used to increase chlamydia screening in general practice: a qualitative study.
    McNulty CA; Freeman E; Oliver I; Ford-Young W; Randall S
    Public Health; 2008 Sep; 122(9):845-56. PubMed ID: 18620715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Designing tailored Web-based instruction to improve practicing physicians' chlamydial screening rates.
    Casebeer L; Allison J; Spettell CM
    Acad Med; 2002 Sep; 77(9):929. PubMed ID: 12228099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who tests whom? A comprehensive overview of Chlamydia trachomatis test practices in a Dutch region among different STI care providers for urogenital, anorectal and oropharyngeal sites in young people: a cross-sectional study.
    den Heijer CD; van Liere GA; Hoebe CJ; van Bergen JE; Cals JW; Stals FS; Dukers-Muijrers NH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2016 May; 92(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 26265066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing and screening for chlamydia in general practice: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Thomson A; Morgan S; Henderson K; Tapley A; Spike N; Scott J; van Driel M; Magin P
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2014 Dec; 38(6):542-7. PubMed ID: 25308467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.