These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Porous TiNbZr alloy scaffolds for biomedical applications. Wang X; Li Y; Xiong J; Hodgson PD; Wen C Acta Biomater; 2009 Nov; 5(9):3616-24. PubMed ID: 19505597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simulation of angiogenesis and cell differentiation in a CaP scaffold subjected to compressive strains using a lattice modeling approach. Sandino C; Checa S; Prendergast PJ; Lacroix D Biomaterials; 2010 Mar; 31(8):2446-52. PubMed ID: 19969348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parametric finite element analysis of physical stimuli resulting from mechanical stimulation of tissue engineered cartilage. Babalola OM; Bonassar LJ J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jun; 131(6):061014. PubMed ID: 19449968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. Van Bael S; Chai YC; Truscello S; Moesen M; Kerckhofs G; Van Oosterwyck H; Kruth JP; Schrooten J Acta Biomater; 2012 Jul; 8(7):2824-34. PubMed ID: 22487930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. O'Brien FJ; Harley BA; Waller MA; Yannas IV; Gibson LJ; Prendergast PJ Technol Health Care; 2007; 15(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 17264409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating internal architecture effect in plastic deformation and failure for TPMS-based scaffolds using simulation methods and experimental procedure. Kadkhodapour J; Montazerian H; Raeisi S Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Oct; 43():587-97. PubMed ID: 25175253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D fiber-deposited scaffolds for tissue engineering: influence of pores geometry and architecture on dynamic mechanical properties. Moroni L; de Wijn JR; van Blitterswijk CA Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(7):974-85. PubMed ID: 16055183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of self-assembled nanofibrous silk/polycaprolactone layer on the osteoconductivity and mechanical properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds. Roohani-Esfahani SI; Lu ZF; Li JJ; Ellis-Behnke R; Kaplan DL; Zreiqat H Acta Biomater; 2012 Jan; 8(1):302-12. PubMed ID: 22023750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The correlation of pore morphology, interconnectivity and physical properties of 3D ceramic scaffolds with bone ingrowth. Jones AC; Arns CH; Hutmacher DW; Milthorpe BK; Sheppard AP; Knackstedt MA Biomaterials; 2009 Mar; 30(7):1440-51. PubMed ID: 19091398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compressive characteristics of radially graded porosity scaffolds architectured with minimal surfaces. Afshar M; Pourkamali Anaraki A; Montazerian H Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Nov; 92():254-267. PubMed ID: 30184749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structural and vascular analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds, Part 2: Topology optimisation. Almeida HA; Bártolo PJ Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 868():209-36. PubMed ID: 22692613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Porosity and mechanical properties relationship in PCL porous scaffolds. Guarino V; Causa F; Ambrosio L J Appl Biomater Biomech; 2007; 5(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 20799184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A dynamical study of the mechanical stimuli and tissue differentiation within a CaP scaffold based on micro-CT finite element models. Sandino C; Lacroix D Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):565-76. PubMed ID: 20865437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of mineralized collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone regeneration. Kanungo BP; Silva E; Van Vliet K; Gibson LJ Acta Biomater; 2008 May; 4(3):490-503. PubMed ID: 18294943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The development of computer-aided system for tissue scaffolds (CASTS) system for functionally graded tissue-engineering scaffolds. Sudarmadji N; Chua CK; Leong KF Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 868():111-23. PubMed ID: 22692607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of scaffold architecture and pore size on smooth muscle cell growth. Lee M; Wu BM; Dunn JC J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Dec; 87(4):1010-6. PubMed ID: 18257081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-pressure foaming: a novel method for the fabrication of porous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Chung EJ; Sugimoto M; Koh JL; Ameer GA Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2012 Feb; 18(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 21933018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided tissue engineering: benefiting from the control over scaffold micro-architecture. Tarawneh AM; Wettergreen M; Liebschner MA Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 868():1-25. PubMed ID: 22692601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]