BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22987128)

  • 1. Combined rule extraction and feature elimination in supervised classification.
    Liu S; Patel RY; Daga PR; Liu H; Fu G; Doerksen RJ; Chen Y; Wilkins DE
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2012 Sep; 11(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 22987128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning accurate and interpretable models based on regularized random forests regression.
    Liu S; Dissanayake S; Patel S; Dang X; Mlsna T; Chen Y; Wilkins D
    BMC Syst Biol; 2014; 8 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5. PubMed ID: 25350120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust feature selection for microarray data based on multicriterion fusion.
    Yang F; Mao KZ
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(4):1080-92. PubMed ID: 21566255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rotation of random forests for genomic and proteomic classification problems.
    Stiglic G; Rodriguez JJ; Kokol P
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2011; 696():211-21. PubMed ID: 21431561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward better understanding of protein secondary structure: extracting prediction rules.
    Nguyen MN; Zurada JM; Rajapakse JC
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(3):858-64. PubMed ID: 21393657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A robust ensemble classification method analysis.
    Zhang Z; Li J; Hu H; Zhou H
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 680():149-55. PubMed ID: 20865496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comprehensive comparison of random forests and support vector machines for microarray-based cancer classification.
    Statnikov A; Wang L; Aliferis CF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 9():319. PubMed ID: 18647401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supervised redundant feature detection for tumor classification.
    Zeng XQ; Li GZ
    BMC Med Genomics; 2014; 7 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S5. PubMed ID: 25350857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision forest for classification of gene expression data.
    Huang J; Fang H; Fan X
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Aug; 40(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 20591424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tumor classification based on non-negative matrix factorization using gene expression data.
    Zheng CH; Ng TY; Zhang L; Shiu CK; Wang HQ
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2011 Jun; 10(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 21742573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multiple kernel support vector machine scheme for feature selection and rule extraction from gene expression data of cancer tissue.
    Chen Z; Li J; Wei L
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Oct; 41(2):161-75. PubMed ID: 17851055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature selection and nearest centroid classification for protein mass spectrometry.
    Levner I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():68. PubMed ID: 15788095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recursive fuzzy granulation for gene subsets extraction and cancer classification.
    Tang Y; Zhang YQ; Huang Z; Hu X; Zhao Y
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):723-30. PubMed ID: 19000951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A granular computing approach to gene selection.
    Sun L; Xu J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):1307-14. PubMed ID: 24212026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical geometry based prediction of nonsynonymous SNP functional effects using random forest and neuro-fuzzy classifiers.
    Barenboim M; Masso M; Vaisman II; Jamison DC
    Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1930-9. PubMed ID: 18186470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robustness of Random Forest-based gene selection methods.
    Kursa MB
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 15():8. PubMed ID: 24410865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random forests ensemble classifier trained with data resampling strategy to improve cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis.
    Ozçift A
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 May; 41(5):265-71. PubMed ID: 21419401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are random forests better than support vector machines for microarray-based cancer classification?
    Statnikov A; Aliferis CF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; 2007():686-90. PubMed ID: 18693924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining the significance of fingerprint-based classifiers.
    Luke BT; Collins JR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():545. PubMed ID: 19091087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Convergent Random Forest predictor: methodology for predicting drug response from genome-scale data applied to anti-TNF response.
    Bienkowska JR; Dalgin GS; Batliwalla F; Allaire N; Roubenoff R; Gregersen PK; Carulli JP
    Genomics; 2009 Dec; 94(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 19699293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.