83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22987437)
1. Mortality audit of the Finnish cervical cancer screening program.
Lönnberg S; Nieminen P; Luostarinen T; Anttila A
Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 22987437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Age-specific effectiveness of the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme.
Lönnberg S; Anttila A; Luostarinen T; Nieminen P
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1354-61. PubMed ID: 22665576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elderly women above screening age diagnosed with cervical cancer have a worse prognosis.
Darlin L; Borgfeldt C; Widén E; Kannisto P
Anticancer Res; 2014 Sep; 34(9):5147-51. PubMed ID: 25202106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of the cervical cancer prevention programme: a case-control mortality audit in Lithuania.
Everatt R; Kuzmickienė I; Intaitė B; Anttila A
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Nov; 29(6):504-510. PubMed ID: 32932287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of histologic type and age on survival rates for invasive cervical carcinoma in Taiwan.
Chen RJ; Lin YH; Chen CA; Huang SC; Chow SN; Hsieh CY
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 10329032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in Iceland, 1964-2002: a study on trends in incidence and mortality and the effect of risk factors.
Sigurdsson K; Sigvaldason H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 16553184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of organized and opportunistic Pap testing on the risk of cervical cancer in young women - A case-control study from Finland.
Makkonen P; Heinävaara S; Sarkeala T; Anttila A
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Dec; 147(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 28942994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of mass screening on incidence and mortality of squamous and adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri.
Nieminen P; Kallio M; Hakama M
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):1017-21. PubMed ID: 7770247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening patterns within organized programs and survival of Italian women with invasive cervical cancer.
Zucchetto A; Ronco G; Giorgi Rossi P; Zappa M; Ferretti S; Franzo A; Falcini F; Visioli CB; Zanetti R; Biavati P; La Rosa F; Baracco S; Federico M; Campari C; De Togni A; Piffer S; Pannozzo F; Fusco M; Michiara M; Castaing M; Seghini P; Tisano F; Serraino D;
Prev Med; 2013 Sep; 57(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23732239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mortality trends for cervical squamous and adenocarcinoma in the United States. Relation to incidence and survival.
Sherman ME; Wang SS; Carreon J; Devesa SS
Cancer; 2005 Mar; 103(6):1258-64. PubMed ID: 15693030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oral contraceptives as risk factors for cervical adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas.
Lacey JV; Brinton LA; Abbas FM; Barnes WA; Gravitt PE; Greenberg MD; Greene SM; Hadjimichael OC; McGowan L; Mortel R; Schwartz PE; Silverberg SG; Hildesheim A
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Dec; 8(12):1079-85. PubMed ID: 10613340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carcinoma of the cervical stump. The radiumhemmet series 1959-1987. Treatment and prognosis.
Hellström AC; Sigurjonson T; Pettersson F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Feb; 80(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 11167211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States--a 24-year population-based study.
Smith HO; Tiffany MF; Qualls CR; Key CR
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Aug; 78(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 10926787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
Hristova L; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cancer in the Netherlands 1989-1998: Decrease of squamous cell carcinoma in older women, increase of adenocarcinoma in younger women.
Bulk S; Visser O; Rozendaal L; Verheijen RH; Meijer CJ
Int J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 113(6):1005-9. PubMed ID: 15515017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving cervical cancer screening attendance in Finland.
Virtanen A; Anttila A; Luostarinen T; Malila N; Nieminen P
Int J Cancer; 2015 Mar; 136(6):E677-84. PubMed ID: 25178683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementing the national invasive cervical cancer audit: a local perspective.
Moss EL; Pearmain P; Askew S; Owen G; Reynolds TM; Prabakar IM; Douce G; Parkes J; Menon V; Todd RW; Redman CW
BJOG; 2010 Oct; 117(11):1411-6. PubMed ID: 20716252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening history in women with cervical cancer in a Danish population-based screening program.
Kirschner B; Poll S; Rygaard C; Wåhlin A; Junge J
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jan; 120(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21035171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
