These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22988690)

  • 1. Contemporary adhesives: marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of class II composite restorations.
    Takahashi R; Nikaido T; Tagami J; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Am J Dent; 2012 Jun; 25(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22988690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strength of the bond as a predictor of marginal performance: an in vitro evaluation of contemporary adhesives.
    Bortolotto T; Mileo A; Krejci I
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 20005563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; de Leonardi G; Rosales-Leal JI; Ceballos L; Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 11699738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test.
    Yeşilyurt C; Bulucu B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):26-36. PubMed ID: 16685292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2.
    Barkmeier WW; Los SA; Triolo PT
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):289-93. PubMed ID: 8695004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical margin integrity of Class II resin composite restorations in laser- and bur-prepared cavities using three different adhesive systems.
    Oskoee PA; Kimyai S; Ebrahimi Chaharom ME; Rikhtegaran S; Pournaghi-Azar F
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 22313277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11203784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal integrity of class V restorations: SEM versus dye penetration.
    Ernst CP; Galler P; Willershausen B; Haller B
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 17669480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
    Sensi LG; Marson FC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Junior S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.