These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band. Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):1944-56. PubMed ID: 3429732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands. Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):262-72. PubMed ID: 2921408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of frequency selectivity on comodulation masking release in normal-hearing listeners. Hall JW; Grose JH; Moore BC J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):410-23. PubMed ID: 8487531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers. Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):725-31. PubMed ID: 2212296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can comodulation masking release occur when frequency changes could promote perceptual segregation of the on-frequency and flanking bands? Verhey JL; Epp B; Stasiak A; Winter IM Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():475-82. PubMed ID: 23716254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Within- and across-channel processing in auditory masking: a physiological study in the songbird forebrain. Hofer SB; Klump GM J Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 23(13):5732-9. PubMed ID: 12843277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Signal detection in complex comodulated backgrounds by normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners. Hall JW; Grose JH J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 8120254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors contributing to comodulation masking release with dichotic maskers. Buss E; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):1905-8. PubMed ID: 19062829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm. Klink KB; Dierker H; Beutelmann R; Klump GM J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 19763691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative contributions of envelope maxima and minima to comodulation masking release. Hall JW; Grose JH Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):349-72. PubMed ID: 1775647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comodulation masking release as a function of type of signal, gated or continuous masking, monaural or dichotic presentation of flanking bands, and center frequency. Fantini DA; Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2106-15. PubMed ID: 8473623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release. Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Schooneveldt GP J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1683-94. PubMed ID: 2341672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Failure to obtain comodulation masking release with frequency-modulated maskers. Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jun; 83(6):2290-2. PubMed ID: 3411020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comodulation masking release in a songbird. Klump GM; Langemann U Hear Res; 1995 Jul; 87(1-2):157-64. PubMed ID: 8567432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms. Borrill SJ; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):309-19. PubMed ID: 11833537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of signal-frequency uncertainty on comodulation masking release. Grose JH; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1272-7. PubMed ID: 2324394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]