These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22991211)

  • 21. Cochlear blood flow and speech perception ability in cochlear implant users.
    Nakashima T; Hattori T; Sone M; Asahi K; Matsuda N; Teranishi M; Yoshida T; Kato K; Sato E
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 22215456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
    D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Indications for middle ear obliteration within the scope of cochlear implant management].
    Issing PR; Schönermark M; Kempf HG; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):727-31. PubMed ID: 9081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: variables affecting auditory performance.
    Carlson ML; Breen JT; Driscoll CL; Link MJ; Neff BA; Gifford RH; Beatty CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):853-62. PubMed ID: 22664900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of nonlinguistic sounds.
    Inverso Y; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 20588119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictive factors in cochlear implants.
    Albu S; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1997; 51(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9105476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of cochlear implant electrode insertion on middle-ear function as measured by intra-operative laser Doppler vibrometry.
    Donnelly N; Bibas A; Jiang D; Bamiou DE; Santulli C; Jeronimidis G; Fitzgerald O'Connor A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):723-9. PubMed ID: 19138455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Qualitative analysis of voice and speech in patients with cochlear implant-- preliminary results].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Kasperuk J; Rutkowski R; Ryćko P
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 Oct; 27(160):305-10. PubMed ID: 19928659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Value of the promontory stimulation test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Lee JC; Yoo MH; Ahn JH; Lee KS
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Nov; 117(11):1988-92. PubMed ID: 17767084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evolution of non-speech sound memory in postlingual deafness: implications for cochlear implant rehabilitation.
    Lazard DS; Giraud AL; Truy E; Lee HJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2475-82. PubMed ID: 21557954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of gender on the hearing performance of adult cochlear implant patients.
    Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
    Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1126-9. PubMed ID: 22374914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.
    Morris LG; Mallur PS; Roland JT; Waltzman SB; Lalwani AK
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults.
    Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jul; 147(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 22344289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.