These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22991637)

  • 1. Comparison of Accuracy of Conventional Periapical Radiography and Direct Digital Subtractions Radiography with or without Image Enhancement in the Diagnosis of Density Changes.
    Razi T; Mohammadi A; Ghojazadeh M
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2012; 6(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 22991637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of periapical changes following endodontic therapy: digital subtraction technique compared with computerized morphometric analysis.
    Carvalho FB; Gonçalves M; Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM; Tanomaru-Filho M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):438-44. PubMed ID: 19767513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of chronic periapical lesions by digital subtraction radiography by using Adobe Photoshop CS: a technical report.
    Carvalho FB; Gonçalves M; Tanomaru-Filho M
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 17368347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study on diagnostic accuracy of colour coded digital images, direct digital images and conventional radiographs for periapical lesions - an in vitro study.
    Pati AR; Mubeen ; K R V; Bhuyan SK; Panigrahi RG; Priyadarshini SR; Misra S; Singh C
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Nov; 8(11):ZC55-9. PubMed ID: 25584318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
    Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image processing for enhanced observer agreement in the evaluation of periapical bone changes.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Bragger U; Patrikiou A; Stassinakis A; Lang NP
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jul; 35(7):615-22. PubMed ID: 12190901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of linear measurements before and after digitizing periapical and panoramic radiography images.
    Langlois Cde O; Sampaio MC; Silva AE; Costa NP; Rockenbach MI
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22011897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: a clinical study.
    Kullendorff B; Petersson K; Rohlin M
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Aug; 13(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 9550045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subtraction radiography of interradicular bone lesions.
    Kullendorff B; Gröndahl K; Rohlin M; Nilsson M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Oct; 50(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 1441929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jul; 16(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 2668346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Subjective Assessment of Perceived Clarity of Indirect Digital Images and Processed Digital Images with Conventional Intra-oral Periapical Radiographs.
    Malleshi SN; V G M; Raina A; Patil K
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Aug; 7(8):1793-6. PubMed ID: 24086916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital subtraction radiography evaluation of the bone repair process of chronic apical periodontitis after root canal treatment.
    Benfica e Silva J; Leles CR; Alencar AH; Nunes CA; Mendonça EF
    Int Endod J; 2010 Aug; 43(8):673-80. PubMed ID: 20491984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital radiograph registration and subtraction: a useful tool for the evaluation of the progress of chronic apical periodontitis.
    Mikrogeorgis G; Lyroudia K; Molyvdas I; Nikolaidis N; Pitas I
    J Endod; 2004 Jul; 30(7):513-7. PubMed ID: 15220649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure time reduction of secondary radiographs used in digital subtraction radiography in detecting intrabony change.
    Matsuda Y; Terauchi T; Murahira K; Patil S; Joshi V; Araki K; Taguchi A; Okano T
    Oral Radiol; 2014; 30(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 24391352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting dynamic range and image enhancement ability of contemporary digital radiographic systems.
    Marinho-Vieira LE; Martins LAC; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 May; 51(4):20210404. PubMed ID: 34860568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.