These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22991637)

  • 21. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography in the assessment of external apical root resorption induced by orthodontic therapy: a retrospective study.
    Sunku R; Roopesh R; Kancherla P; Perumalla KK; Yudhistar PV; Reddy VS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):422-8. PubMed ID: 22269231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of phosphor-plate digital images with conventional radiographs for the perceived clarity of fine endodontic files and periapical lesions.
    Friedlander LT; Love RM; Chandler NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Mar; 93(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 11925542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital subtraction radiography evaluation of longitudinal bone density changes around immediate loading implants: a pilot study.
    Carneiro LS; da Cunha HA; Leles CR; Mendonça EF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Mar; 41(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22074866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system.
    Ellwood RP; Davies RM; Worthington HV
    J Periodontal Res; 1997 Feb; 32(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 9089491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurements of simulated periodontal bone defects in inverted digital image and film-based radiograph: an in vitro study.
    de Molon RS; Morais-Camillo JA; Sakakura CE; Ferreira MG; Loffredo LC; Scaf G
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Dec; 42(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 23301211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of external root resorption using digital subtraction radiography.
    Kravitz LH; Tyndall DA; Bagnell CP; Dove SB
    J Endod; 1992 Jun; 18(6):275-84. PubMed ID: 1402585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Tanaka JL; Soares MG; Haiter-Neto F; Ono E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160120. PubMed ID: 27376702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography.
    Heo MS; Lee SS; Lee KH; Choi HM; Choi SC; Park TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 11250638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Observer evaluation of scatter subtraction for digital portable chest radiographs.
    Baker JA; Floyd CE; Lo JY; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Aug; 28(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 8375997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
    Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of stent versus laser- and cephalostat-aligned periapical film-positioning techniques for use in digital subtraction radiography.
    Ludlow JB; Peleaux CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8139840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
    J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of hard tissue density changes around implants assessed in digitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; Bóscolo FN; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16958697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Clinical application prospect of digital subtraction technique for periapical radiographs].
    Ma X; Zhang G; Chen H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Nov; 30(6):323-5, 383. PubMed ID: 8762531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sources of noise in digital subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A; Sewerin I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Apr; 71(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 2052339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of direct digital and conventional intraoral radiographs in detecting alveolar bone loss.
    Khocht A; Janal M; Harasty L; Chang KM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 134(11):1468-75. PubMed ID: 14664265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation by digital subtraction radiography of induced changes in the bone density of the female rat mandible.
    Mahl CR; Fontanella V
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):438-44. PubMed ID: 19033428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.