154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22991646)
21. Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Implant-supported Cement-retained Crowns with Short Abutments: An
Kalla K; Arunachalam S; Behera SSP; Konchada J; Lankapalli S; Vanisetti L
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec; 22(12):1451-1456. PubMed ID: 35656686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the effect of implant abutment surface modifications on retention of implant-supported restoration with a polymer based cement.
Sahu N; Lakshmi N; Azhagarasan NS; Agnihotri Y; Rajan M; Hariharan R
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Jan; 8(1):239-42. PubMed ID: 24596785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of varying titanium base abutment heights on retention of zirconia restorations: An in vitro study.
Nguyen O; Lee SJ; Lee JD
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):604.e1-604.e5. PubMed ID: 37633730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The ability to screw-retain single implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT analysis.
Edmondson EK; Trejo PM; Soldatos N; Weltman RL
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):443-449. PubMed ID: 33610330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns.
Covey DA; Kent DK; St Germain HA; Koka S
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 10709044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of different geometric changes in the dental implant abutment body on the amount of residual excess cement and retention in a cemented implant-supported prosthesis.
Negahdari R; Bohlouli S; Yazdani J; Torab A; Dizaj SM
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 34019744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of debonding force of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to abutments of different designs and surface treatments.
Latif Khalifa AA; Metwally NA; Khamis MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36813587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the dislodgement force of splinted restorations with engaging conical abutments over multiple nonparallel implants (in-vitro study).
Khamis MM; Zakaria NH; Farrag KM; Abolgheit S
BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):300. PubMed ID: 37198623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Geometry of Implant Abutment Surface Improving Cement Effectiveness: An
Rathod A; Jalaluddin M; Shrinivas ; Devadiga TJ; Jha S; Alzahrani KM
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Nov; 13(Suppl 2):S1093-S1097. PubMed ID: 35017936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Strain analysis of 9 different abutments for cement-retained crowns on an internal hexagonal implant.
Salaita LG; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; Chien HH; McGlumphy EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Aug; 118(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 28126354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].
Harel N; Livne S; Piek D; Marku-Cohen S; Ormianer Z
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):19-25, 63. PubMed ID: 22991873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Abutment margin levels and residual cement occurrence in cement-retained implant restorations: An observational study.
Kim HJ; Karasan D; Park K; Kwon HB; Han JS; Lee JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jan; 34(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 36278423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study.
Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 17302949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vitro retentive strength of metal superstructures cemented to solid abutments.
Rappelli G; Corso M; Coccia E; Camaioni E; Di Felice R; Procaccini M
Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Mar; 57(3):95-101. PubMed ID: 18427377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the masking ability, marginal adaptation, and fracture resistance of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to titanium bases versus preparable abutments.
Kordi AWM; Salman AI; Metwally NA; Khamis MM
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):613. PubMed ID: 37649061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
