These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22992208)

  • 41. Both lexical and non-lexical characters are processed during saccadic eye movements.
    Zhang H; Yan HM; Kendrick KM; Li CY
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e46383. PubMed ID: 23029504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
    Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Integration of Sentence-Level Semantic Information in Parafovea: Evidence from the RSVP-Flanker Paradigm.
    Zhang W; Li N; Wang X; Wang S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139016. PubMed ID: 26418230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Processing multiconstituent units: Preview effects during reading of Chinese words, idioms, and phrases.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Du H; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):169-188. PubMed ID: 37227876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading.
    Kliegl R; Hohenstein S; Yan M; McDonald SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):581-600. PubMed ID: 22515948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cross-language parafoveal semantic processing: Evidence from Korean-Chinese bilinguals.
    Wang A; Yeon J; Zhou W; Shu H; Yan M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):285-90. PubMed ID: 26122894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Processing difficulty while reading words with neighbors is not due to increased foveal load: Evidence from eye movements.
    Johnson RL; Slattery TJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1360-1374. PubMed ID: 38532237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reaction time reduction after parafoveal preview in a lexical decision task.
    Grieco A; Beretta G; Casco C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Aug; 103(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17037638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Parafoveal processing of inflectional morphology in Russian: A within-word boundary-change paradigm.
    Stoops A; Christianson K
    Vision Res; 2019 May; 158():1-10. PubMed ID: 30738035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading.
    Pynte J; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1215-27. PubMed ID: 17275060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences.
    Yen MH; Radach R; Tzeng OJ; Hung DL; Tsai JL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 19285294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Semantic preview benefit and cost: Evidence from parafoveal fast-priming paradigm.
    Pan J; Yan M; Laubrock J
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104452. PubMed ID: 32971508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading.
    White SJ; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 16235630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.