These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22992447)

  • 1. Speech recognition and subjective perceptions of neck-loop FM receivers with cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Huynh C; Romine D; Jimenez R
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 22992447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromagnetic versus electrical coupling of personal frequency modulation (FM) receivers to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Romine D; Musgrave E; Momin S; Huynh C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):927-40. PubMed ID: 24384079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A proposed electroacoustic test protocol for personal FM receivers coupled to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Musgrave E; Momin S; Sandrock C; Romine D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):941-54. PubMed ID: 24384080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing the benefit of sound processors coupled to personal FM systems.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Sep; 19(8):585-94. PubMed ID: 19323350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of input processing and type of personal frequency modulation system on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Wolfe J; Schafer E; Parkinson A; John A; Hudson M; Wheeler J; Mucci A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 22941405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Recognition in noise in children with cochlear implants while listening in bilateral, bimodal, and FM-system arrangements.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 17182876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits of adaptive FM systems on speech recognition in noise for listeners who use hearing aids.
    Thibodeau L
    Am J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 19(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 20220201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verification of a Proposed Clinical Electroacoustic Test Protocol for Personal Digital Modulation Receivers Coupled to Cochlear Implant Sound Processors.
    Nair EL; Sousa R; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(7):625-635. PubMed ID: 28722645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
    Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition abilities of adults using cochlear implants with FM systems.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004; 15(10):678-91. PubMed ID: 15646666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Users' perspectives on the benefits of FM systems with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Fournier P; Séguin C; Armstrong S; Chénier J; Schramm D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20053156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear implant outcomes in adults and adolescents with early-onset hearing loss.
    Caposecco A; Hickson L; Pedley K
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 21934504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.